Skiff J0458+43.0

(MWSC 442; Skiff 2; FoF 1366)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.57 UTI
0.63
CN
0.26
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.74
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 3.1 [pc], 1.3 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.63 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 0.26 Loose
  • CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
  • Clit 0.74 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Skiff J0458+43.0 is a moderately populated, loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.94 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.94 (50th percentile).

Bica et al. (2019)
Web updates in DAML02, some were later removed (2003 to 2010).

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 74.54 43.036 0.341 0.568 -1.152 -0.198
Almeida et al. 2025 74.568 43.039 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 74.544 43.01 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 74.544 43.01 0.322 0.555 -1.2 -17.049
Cavallo et al. 2024 74.555 43.033 0.328 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 74.544 43.01 0.322 0.555 -1.2 -17.049
Just et al. 2023 74.527 43.007 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 74.547 43.036 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 74.568 43.039 0.342 0.544 -1.107 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 74.547 43.036 0.382 0.595 -1.109 –
Zhong et al. 2020 74.547 43.036 – 0.595 -1.109 -6.769
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 74.547 43.036 0.382 0.595 -1.109 –
Liu & Pang 2019 74.525 43.044 0.279 0.465 -1.323 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 74.547 43.036 – – – -16.39
Bica et al. 2019 74.547 43.016 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 74.547 43.036 0.382 0.595 -1.109 –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – 0.75 -1.53 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 74.565 43.013 – -1.17 -4.036 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 74.558 43.013 – -0.21 -2.01 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 74.527 43.007 – – – –
Tadross 2014 74.558 43.013 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 74.558 43.013 – -0.01 -0.78 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 74.538 43.007 – -2.92 -2.68 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 74.538 43.007 – -2.92 -2.68 –
Dias et al. 2002 74.558 43.013 – -0.01 -0.78 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.53 1.26 1.6 501 0.037 321 – 0
Almeida et al. 2025 2.38 1.39 – 569 – 112 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – 0.037(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 2.53 1.30 1.60 350 – 523(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 3.63 1.74 – 151 0.740 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.53 1.30 1.60 351 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 501 – 659 – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 2.64 0.91 – 339 – 119 – 0(1)
Dias et al. 2021 2.38 1.39 – 569 -0.183 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.64 0.91 – 339 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 3.26 1.38 – 501 – – – –
Zhong et al. 2020 2.44(1) 1.26 – 8700 0.000 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.44 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 562 0.500 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.44 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.44 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.67 1.16 – 407 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 3.00 1.26 – 501 – – – –
Tadross 2014 2.12 0.57 – 900 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 3.00 1.26 – 501 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 3.00 1.26 – 501 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.12 0.57 – 891 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸