Skiff J0058+68.4
(FSR 0523; MWSC 94; Skiff 1; MWSC 95; FoF 607)
0.92
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.81
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
19.5 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.81 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Skiff J0058+68.4 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 14.605 | 68.455 | 0.355 | -2.064 | 0.323 | -23.824 |
| Otto et al. | 2026 | 14.577 | 68.476 | â | -2.06 | 0.37 | -24.2 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 14.604 | 68.458 | 0.319 | -2.063 | 0.366 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 14.63 | 68.463 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 14.577 | 68.476 | 0.352 | -2.057 | 0.314 | -17.043 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 14.613 | 68.452 | 0.356 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 14.577 | 68.476 | 0.352 | -2.057 | 0.314 | -17.043 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 14.53 | 68.462 | â | â | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 14.604 | 68.458 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 14.63 | 68.463 | 0.319 | -2.075 | 0.375 | -23.359 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 14.604 | 68.458 | 0.319 | -2.063 | 0.366 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 14.604 | 68.458 | 0.319 | -2.063 | 0.366 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 14.676 | 68.453 | 0.309 | -2.029 | 0.35 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 14.604 | 68.458 | â | â | â | -23.4 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 14.59 | 68.463 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 14.604 | 68.458 | 0.319 | -2.063 | 0.366 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2018 | â | â | â | -0.49 | -0.09 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 14.625 | 68.469 | â | -0.861 | 0.072 | â |
| Sampedro et al. | 2017 | 14.621 | 68.469 | -2.31 | -5.2 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 14.53 | 68.462 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 14.621 | 68.469 | â | -1.56 | -4.81 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 14.542 | 68.465 | â | -1.83 | 0.79 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 14.542 | 68.465 | â | -2.29 | 0.81 | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 14.537 | 68.492 | â | â | â | â |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 14.646 | 68.467 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 14.621 | 68.469 | â | -1.56 | -4.81 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.48 | 2.085 | 1.34 | 1047 | 0.040 | 2153 | â | 1 |
| Otto et al. | 2026 | â | â | â | 1413 | -0.140(15) | â | â | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.27 | 2.47 | â | 1062 | 0.063 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.24 | 2.68 | â | 1045 | â | 2153 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 5375(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.68 | 3.22 | â | 427 | 0.040 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.62 | 2.88 | 1.34 | 417 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1023 | â | 1419 | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 2.48 | 1.77 | â | 1413 | â | 3680 | â | 1(1) |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.24 | 2.68 | â | 1045 | -0.214 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.48 | 1.77 | â | 1413 | â | â | â | â |
| Kounkel et al. | 2020 | 3.08 | 2.12 | â | 1175 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.87 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 1350 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.87 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.87 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.90 | 1.81 | â | 933 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.00 | 2.05 | â | 1023 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.00 | 2.05 | â | 1023 | â | â | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2012 | â | â | â | â | â | 1058 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.00 | 2.05 | â | 1047 | â | â | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 2.10(1) | 1.48 | â | 1122 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.60 | 2.68 | â | 1259 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 1.00 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).
Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 1.00 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).
Bica et al. (2019)
Web updates in DAML02, some were later removed (2003 to 2010).