Skiff J0058+68.4

(FSR 0523; MWSC 94; Skiff 1; MWSC 95; FoF 607)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.92 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.81
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 19.5 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.81 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Skiff J0058+68.4 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 1.00 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 1.00 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).

Bica et al. (2019)
Web updates in DAML02, some were later removed (2003 to 2010).

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 14.605 68.455 0.355 -2.064 0.323 -23.824
Otto et al. 2026 14.577 68.476 – -2.06 0.37 -24.2
Li et al. 2025 14.604 68.458 0.319 -2.063 0.366 –
Almeida et al. 2025 14.63 68.463 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 14.577 68.476 0.352 -2.057 0.314 -17.043
Cavallo et al. 2024 14.613 68.452 0.356 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 14.577 68.476 0.352 -2.057 0.314 -17.043
Just et al. 2023 14.53 68.462 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 14.604 68.458 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 14.63 68.463 0.319 -2.075 0.375 -23.359
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 14.604 68.458 0.319 -2.063 0.366 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 14.604 68.458 0.319 -2.063 0.366 –
Liu & Pang 2019 14.676 68.453 0.309 -2.029 0.35 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 14.604 68.458 – – – -23.4
Bica et al. 2019 14.59 68.463 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 14.604 68.458 0.319 -2.063 0.366 –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – -0.49 -0.09 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 14.625 68.469 – -0.861 0.072 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 14.621 68.469 -2.31 -5.2 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 14.53 68.462 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 14.621 68.469 – -1.56 -4.81 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 14.542 68.465 – -1.83 0.79 –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 14.542 68.465 – -2.29 0.81 –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 14.537 68.492 – – – –
Froebrich et al. 2007 14.646 68.467 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 14.621 68.469 – -1.56 -4.81 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.48 2.085 1.34 1047 0.040 2153 – 1
Otto et al. 2026 – – – 1413 -0.140(15) – – –
Li et al. 2025 2.27 2.47 – 1062 0.063 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.24 2.68 – 1045 – 2153 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 5375(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.68 3.22 – 427 0.040 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.62 2.88 1.34 417 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 1023 – 1419 – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 2.48 1.77 – 1413 – 3680 – 1(1)
Dias et al. 2021 2.24 2.68 – 1045 -0.214 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.48 1.77 – 1413 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 3.08 2.12 – 1175 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.87 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 1350 0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.87 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.87 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 3.90 1.81 – 933 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.00 2.05 – 1023 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.00 2.05 – 1023 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 1058 – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 2.00 2.05 – 1047 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 2.10(1) 1.48 – 1122 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.60 2.68 – 1259 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸