Ruprecht 68

(VDBH 49; MWSC 1547; OCL 729; vdBergh-Hagen 49; ESO 371 12; FSR 1384; FoF 592)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.95 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.87
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 2.6 [pc], 9.5 [pc-2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.87 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Ruprecht 68 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.0703, e_all=0.1166.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 131.146 -35.9 0.329 -2.619 5.652 50.578
Li et al. 2025 131.147 -35.9 0.301 -2.619 5.61 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 131.152 -35.898 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 131.155 -35.901 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 131.138 -35.898 0.335 -2.608 5.662 52.162
Cavallo et al. 2024 131.152 -35.898 0.334 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 131.138 -35.898 0.335 -2.608 5.662 52.162
Almeida et al. 2023 131.15 -35.906 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 131.142 -35.882 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 131.147 -35.9 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 131.155 -35.901 0.301 -2.618 5.591 51.023
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 131.147 -35.9 0.301 -2.619 5.61 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 131.146 -35.9 – -2.635 5.576 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 131.147 -35.9 0.301 -2.619 5.61 –
Liu & Pang 2019 131.157 -35.901 0.309 -2.612 5.59 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 131.147 -35.9 – – – 50.62
Bica et al. 2019 131.151 -35.903 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 131.147 -35.9 0.301 -2.619 5.61 –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – -3.45 4.24 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 131.146 -35.9 – -5.58 2.28 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 131.142 -35.882 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 131.146 -35.9 – -5.78 2.6 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 131.148 -35.885 – -8.19 8.66 –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 131.133 -35.905 – – – –
Glushkova et al. 2010 131.144 -35.9 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 131.146 -35.9 – -5.78 2.6 –
Lynga 1987 131.12 -35.936 – – – –
van den Bergh & Hagen 1975 130.625 -35.75 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.705 1.06 0.38 1820 -0.121 2356 0.59 0
Li et al. 2025 2.78 1.34 – 1871 -0.240 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.140(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.54 1.02 – 2307 – 1836 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 2.70 1.00 0.38 1628 – 2877(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.55 1.22 – 1820 0.030 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.70 1.00 0.38 1629 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.71 1.42 – 1754 -0.102 1117(1) 0.59 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 2239 – 158 – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 3.03 1.09 – 1820 – 3993 – 0(1)
Dias et al. 2021 2.54 1.02 – 2307 0.130 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 3.03 1.09 – 1820 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 2.75 1.06 – 2042 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 3.03 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 2510 -0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 3.03 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 3.03 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.18 1.05 – 2239 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.18 1.05 – 2239 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 4227 – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 3.02(1) 0.60 – 1585 – – – –
Glushkova et al. 2010 1.99 1.23 – 1413 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.99 1.23 – 1413 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️