Ruprecht 68

(VDBH 49; MWSC 1547; OCL 729; vdBergh-Hagen 49; ESO 371 12; FSR 1384; FoF 592)

1.0 UTI

1.0

C_N

1.0

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification AA

Number of members (P>50%) 663

Radius (P>50% members) 4.9 [arcmin]

C_N 1.0 Very rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Ruprecht 68 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Old

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for Ruprecht 68 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	131.146	-35.9	0.329	-2.619	5.652	50.578
Li et al.	2025	131.147	-35.9	0.301	-2.619	5.61	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	131.152	-35.898	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	131.155	-35.901	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	131.138	-35.898	0.335	-2.608	5.662	52.162
Cavallo et al.	2024	131.152	-35.898	0.334	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	131.138	-35.898	0.335	-2.608	5.662	52.162
Almeida et al.	2023	131.15	-35.906	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	131.142	-35.882	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	131.155	-35.901	0.301	-2.618	5.591	51.023
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	131.147	-35.9	0.301	-2.619	5.61	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	131.146	-35.9	–	-2.635	5.576	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	131.147	-35.9	0.301	-2.619	5.61	–
Liu & Pang	2019	131.157	-35.901	0.309	-2.612	5.59	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	131.147	-35.9	–	–	–	50.62
Bica et al.	2019	131.151	-35.903	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	131.147	-35.9	0.301	-2.619	5.61	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	131.142	-35.882	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	131.146	-35.9	–	-5.78	2.6	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	131.148	-35.885	–	-8.19	8.66	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	131.144	-35.9	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	131.146	-35.9	–	-5.78	2.6	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Li et al.	2025	2.78	1.34	–	1871	-0.240	–	–	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	–	–	–	–	-0.140*	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	2.54	1.02	–	2307	–	1836	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	2877*	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	2.55	1.22	–	1820	0.030	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	2.70	1.00	0.38	1629	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	2.71	1.42	–	1754	-0.102	1117*	0.59	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	2239	–	158	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	2.54	1.02	–	2307	0.130	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	3.03	1.09	–	1820	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	3.03	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	2510	-0.250	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	3.03	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	3.03	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	2.18	1.03	–	2239	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	2.18	1.03	–	2239	–	–	–	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	1.99	1.21	–	1413	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.99	1.21	–	1413	–	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3