Ruprecht 44
(MWSC 1398; OCL 681; ESO 430 05)
0.95
UTI
0.77
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
8.4 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.77 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Ruprecht 44 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 119.704 | -28.558 | 0.176 | -2.352 | 2.934 | 114.157 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 119.708 | -28.558 | 0.152 | -2.381 | 2.935 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 119.713 | -28.569 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 119.692 | -28.547 | 0.181 | -2.334 | 2.917 | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 119.708 | -28.558 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 119.697 | -28.562 | 0.181 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 119.692 | -28.547 | 0.181 | -2.334 | 2.917 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 119.712 | -28.569 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 119.717 | -28.583 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 119.709 | -28.563 | 0.183 | -2.366 | 2.918 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 119.708 | -28.558 | 0.152 | -2.381 | 2.935 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 119.713 | -28.569 | 0.156 | -2.378 | 2.938 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 119.708 | -28.558 | 0.152 | -2.381 | 2.935 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 119.708 | -28.558 | 0.152 | -2.381 | 2.935 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 119.713 | -28.583 | 0.172 | -2.338 | 2.843 | 64.017 |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 119.708 | -28.558 | â | â | â | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 119.711 | -28.566 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 119.708 | -28.558 | 0.152 | -2.381 | 2.935 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 119.715 | -28.582 | â | -2.618 | -0.892 | 93.7 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 119.717 | -28.583 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 119.713 | -28.583 | â | -2.17 | 0.17 | 93.7 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 119.722 | -28.585 | â | -1.58 | 1.02 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 119.707 | -28.58 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 119.725 | -28.583 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 119.71 | -28.58 | â | -5.4 | 0.17 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 119.713 | -28.583 | â | -2.17 | 0.17 | 93.7 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 119.725 | -28.583 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 4.67 | 1.9 | 1.87 | 14 | -0.173 | 1171 | 0.57 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 4.77 | 1.84 | â | 22 | -0.056 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 4.50 | 1.96 | â | 12 | â | 34 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1948(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 14 | â | 731 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.58 | 1.86 | â | 27 | -0.290 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 5.14 | 1.79 | 1.87 | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 4.14 | 1.97 | â | 16 | -0.232 | 1171(1) | 0.57 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 6 | â | 3698 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 5.53(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 5.54 | 1.86 | â | 13 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 4.50 | 1.96 | â | 12 | -0.115 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 5.75 | 1.64 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 5.54 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 4.34 | 1.36 | â | 23 | -0.642 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 5.89 | 1.89 | â | 14 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 5.54 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 4.64 | 1.91 | â | 9 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 4.67 | 1.87 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 4.67 | 1.87 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 4.66 | 1.92 | â | 21 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 4.73 | 1.92 | â | 9 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 4.66 | 1.92 | â | 21 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.73 | 1.92 | â | 9 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 3.89 | 2.00 | â | 3 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.