Ruprecht 4
(Berkeley 74; MWSC 990; OCL 560; FSR 1165)
0.74
UTI
0.79
CN
0.57
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.81
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Nm (P>50%)
210
Core radius and density
2.3 [pc], 2.8 [pc-2]
- CN 0.79 Rich
- Cdens 0.57 Moderately dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.81 Well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Ruprecht 4 is a rich, moderately dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 102.247 | -10.526 | 0.218 | -0.213 | 0.103 | 46.421 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 102.248 | -10.524 | 0.214 | -0.197 | 0.096 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 102.235 | -10.52 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 102.243 | -10.529 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 102.245 | -10.53 | 0.211 | -0.215 | 0.098 | 46.518 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 102.235 | -10.52 | 0.213 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 102.245 | -10.53 | 0.211 | -0.215 | 0.098 | 46.518 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 102.24 | -10.529 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 102.234 | -10.508 | â | â | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 102.248 | -10.524 | â | â | â | â |
| Netopil et al. | 2022 | 102.225 | -10.533 | â | â | â | 47.5 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 102.243 | -10.529 | 0.209 | -0.205 | 0.126 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 102.248 | -10.524 | 0.214 | -0.197 | 0.096 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 102.248 | -10.524 | 0.214 | -0.197 | 0.096 | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 102.248 | -10.514 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 102.248 | -10.524 | 0.214 | -0.197 | 0.096 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 102.24 | -10.51 | â | 0.562 | 0.347 | 47.5 |
| Sampedro et al. | 2017 | 102.225 | -10.533 | â | 0.87 | -3.8 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 102.234 | -10.508 | â | â | â | â |
| Netopil et al. | 2016 | 102.24 | -10.51 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 102.225 | -10.533 | â | 0.94 | -4.3 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 102.24 | -10.51 | â | 1.79 | 2.17 | 47.5 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 102.225 | -10.533 | â | â | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 102.246 | -10.512 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 102.225 | -10.533 | â | 0.94 | -4.3 | 47.5 |
| Lynga | 1987 | 102.216 | -10.541 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 4.09 | 1.46 | 1.63 | 851 | -0.100 | 692 | 0.7 | 0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 3.65 | 1.51 | â | 851 | -0.154 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.250(5) | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 3.60 | 1.67 | â | 643 | â | 482 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 3.87 | 1.45 | 1.63 | 574 | â | 1660(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.18 | 1.55 | â | 977 | -0.240 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 3.87 | 1.46 | 1.63 | 574 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 3.58 | 1.67 | â | 708 | -0.175 | 738(1) | 0.70 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 1012 | â | 989 | â | â |
| Jadhav & Subramaniam | 2021 | 4.09 | 1.24 | â | 851 | â | 645 | â | 0(1) |
| Netopil et al. | 2022 | 4.09(1) | â | â | 851 | -0.100(1) | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 3.60 | 1.67 | â | 643 | -0.100 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 4.09 | 1.24 | â | 851 | â | â | â | â |
| Kounkel et al. | 2020 | 4.12 | 1.71 | â | 589 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 4.12 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 4.12 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 5.82 | 1.76 | â | 631 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 4.59 | 1.44 | â | 1012 | â | â | â | â |
| Netopil et al. | 2016 | 11.63 | â | â | 1030 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 4.59 | 1.44 | â | 1012 | -0.090 | â | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2012 | â | â | â | â | â | 547 | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 4.70 | â | â | 794 | -0.090 | â | â | â |
| Bukowiecki et al. | 2011 | 3.97(1) | 0.69 | â | 1122 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 4.70 | 0.95 | â | 794 | -0.090 | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).
Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.98 (50th percentile).
Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.2927, e_all=0.1089.