Ruprecht 29
0.69
UTI
0.56
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.5
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
3.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.56 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.5 Intermediate quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Ruprecht 29 is a moderately populated, very dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 115.255 | -24.39 | 0.44 | -2.134 | 1.623 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 115.279 | -24.377 | 0.44 | -2.138 | 1.617 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 115.292 | -24.381 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 115.244 | -24.398 | 0.437 | -2.147 | 1.625 | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 115.27 | -24.391 | 0.441 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 115.244 | -24.398 | 0.437 | -2.147 | 1.625 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 115.292 | -24.381 | 0.449 | -2.143 | 1.631 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 115.279 | -24.377 | 0.44 | -2.138 | 1.617 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 115.279 | -24.377 | 0.44 | -2.138 | 1.617 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 115.279 | -24.377 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 115.279 | -24.377 | â | â | â | 44.62 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 115.279 | -24.377 | 0.44 | -2.138 | 1.617 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 115.32 | -24.355 | â | -3.161 | 4.385 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.91 | 0.87 | â | 79 | -0.259 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.08 | 1.04 | â | 57 | â | 176 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 288* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.04 | 1.10 | â | 58 | -0.090 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.07 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 96 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.08 | 1.04 | â | 57 | -0.027 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.02 | 0.37 | â | 240 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.13 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 2.06 | 0.60 | â | 145 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.13 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.13 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 4.92 | 0.89 | â | 794 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.