Ruprecht 25

(OCL 641; ESO 493 01; MWSC 1280)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.74 UTI
0.56
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 1.3 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.56 Moderately populated
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Ruprecht 25 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Very distant Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 114.197 -23.385 0.128 -1.062 1.96 95.694
Hu & Soubiran 2025 114.198 -23.368 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 114.184 -23.383 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 114.198 -23.386 0.099 -1.056 1.903 105.62
Cavallo et al. 2024 114.198 -23.368 0.102 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 114.198 -23.386 0.099 -1.056 1.903 105.62
Almeida et al. 2023 114.186 -23.384 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 114.184 -23.383 0.115 -1.128 1.988 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 114.192 -23.387 0.123 -1.101 1.993 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 114.192 -23.387 0.123 -1.101 1.993 –
Bica et al. 2019 114.192 -23.38 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 114.192 -23.387 0.123 -1.101 1.993 –
Dias et al. 2014 114.196 -23.383 – 0.36 1.67 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.210* – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 6.12 1.84 – 724 – 425 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 707* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 4.31 2.34 – 1023 -1.200 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 7.63 2.09 2.32 440 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 5.62 1.86 – 857 -0.366 400* 0.74 –
Dias et al. 2021 6.12 1.84 – 724 -0.241 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 8.75 1.44 – 316 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 6.57 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 6.57 – – – – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸