Ruprecht 25
(OCL 641; ESO 493 01; MWSC 1280)
0.74
UTI
0.56
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
1.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.56 Moderately populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Ruprecht 25 is a moderately populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
Very distant
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 114.197 | -23.385 | 0.128 | -1.062 | 1.96 | 95.694 |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 114.198 | -23.368 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 114.184 | -23.383 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 114.198 | -23.386 | 0.099 | -1.056 | 1.903 | 105.62 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 114.198 | -23.368 | 0.102 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 114.198 | -23.386 | 0.099 | -1.056 | 1.903 | 105.62 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 114.186 | -23.384 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 114.184 | -23.383 | 0.115 | -1.128 | 1.988 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 114.192 | -23.387 | 0.123 | -1.101 | 1.993 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 114.192 | -23.387 | 0.123 | -1.101 | 1.993 | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 114.192 | -23.38 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 114.192 | -23.387 | 0.123 | -1.101 | 1.993 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 114.196 | -23.383 | â | 0.36 | 1.67 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.210* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 6.12 | 1.84 | â | 724 | â | 425 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 707* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 4.31 | 2.34 | â | 1023 | -1.200 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 7.63 | 2.09 | 2.32 | 440 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 5.62 | 1.86 | â | 857 | -0.366 | 400* | 0.74 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 6.12 | 1.84 | â | 724 | -0.241 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 8.75 | 1.44 | â | 316 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 6.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 6.57 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.