Ruprecht 151
(MWSC 1309; OCL 606)
0.83
UTI
0.39
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
7.6 [arcmin]
- CN 0.39 Poorly populated
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Ruprecht 151 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 115.293 | -16.255 | 0.902 | -4.239 | 3.369 | 22.807 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 115.315 | -16.279 | 0.867 | -4.272 | 3.242 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 115.273 | -16.299 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 115.303 | -16.28 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 115.3 | -16.279 | 0.887 | -4.238 | 3.334 | 21.567 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 115.273 | -16.299 | 0.89 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 115.3 | -16.279 | 0.887 | -4.238 | 3.334 | 21.567 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 115.314 | -16.288 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 115.295 | -16.253 | 0.908 | -4.259 | 3.368 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 115.293 | -16.294 | 0.912 | -4.219 | 3.367 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 115.303 | -16.28 | 0.864 | -4.286 | 3.262 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 115.315 | -16.279 | 0.867 | -4.272 | 3.242 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 115.315 | -16.279 | 0.867 | -4.272 | 3.242 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 115.315 | -16.279 | â | â | â | â |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 115.313 | -16.247 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 115.315 | -16.279 | 0.867 | -4.272 | 3.242 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 115.32 | -16.29 | â | -4.716 | 2.892 | 33.5 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 115.314 | -16.288 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 115.325 | -16.25 | â | -4.11 | 2.55 | 26.02 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 115.32 | -16.29 | â | -2.84 | 3.71 | 33.5 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 115.316 | -16.291 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 115.32 | -16.29 | â | -4.3 | 2.1 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 115.32 | -16.27 | â | -3.31 | 1.63 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.33 | 0.35 | â | 824 | -0.049 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.200* | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.11 | 0.54 | â | 621 | â | 90 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 99* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.10 | 0.30 | â | 832 | 0.180 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.07 | 0.26 | 0.49 | 474 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 141 | â | 63 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.40 | â | 631 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.10 | â | â | 490 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.11 | 0.54 | â | 621 | 0.048 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.13 | 0.43 | â | 447 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.12 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.18 | 0.59 | â | 411 | 0.153 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.12 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.85 | 0.25 | â | 646 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.49 | 1.29 | â | 141 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.49 | 1.29 | â | 141 | -0.102 | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 2.10 | 0.62 | â | 309 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 2.10 | 0.62 | â | 309 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.25 | 0.31 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.