Ruprecht 145
(OCL 52; ESO 592 02; MWSC 3005)
0.97
UTI
0.83
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
20.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.83 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Ruprecht 145 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 282.655 | -18.281 | 1.652 | 8.354 | -4.129 | -55.311 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 282.636 | -18.27 | 1.651 | 8.329 | -4.08 | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | 282.656 | -18.278 | â | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 282.924 | -18.022 | 1.651 | 8.329 | -4.003 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 282.67 | -18.232 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 282.649 | -18.244 | 1.615 | 8.337 | -4.096 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 282.658 | -18.293 | 1.653 | 8.372 | -4.131 | -56.166 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 282.656 | -18.278 | 1.655 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 282.658 | -18.293 | 1.653 | 8.372 | -4.131 | -56.166 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 282.617 | -18.201 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 282.637 | -18.276 | 1.66 | 8.319 | -4.14 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 282.655 | -18.307 | 1.653 | 8.348 | -4.096 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 282.67 | -18.232 | 1.651 | 8.32 | -4.058 | -50.624 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 282.636 | -18.27 | 1.651 | 8.329 | -4.08 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 282.636 | -18.27 | 1.651 | 8.329 | -4.08 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 282.636 | -18.27 | â | â | â | -54.7 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 282.578 | -18.182 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 282.636 | -18.27 | 1.651 | 8.329 | -4.08 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 282.66 | -18.227 | â | 2.416 | -7.028 | -8.8 |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 282.65 | -18.25 | â | 0.81 | -4.73 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 282.64 | -18.221 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 282.64 | -18.221 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 282.64 | -18.22 | â | 6.43 | -4.51 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 282.63 | -18.21 | â | 6.1 | -5.31 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 282.65 | -18.25 | â | 6.1 | -5.31 | -8.8 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.57 | 0.58 | â | 1058 | 0.061 | â | â | â |
| Hu & Soubiran | 2025 | â | â | â | â | -0.120* | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 0.71 | 0.68 | â | 891 | 0.250 | 703 | 0.44 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.58 | 0.73 | â | 931 | â | 394 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.63 | 0.55 | â | 966 | 0.038 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 575* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.60 | 0.79 | â | 776 | 0.330 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 568 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.59 | 0.69 | â | 966 | 0.062 | 496* | 0.54 | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.05 | â | 631 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.62 | â | â | 813 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.58 | 0.73 | â | 931 | 0.037 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.63 | 0.55 | â | 813 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.60 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.60 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.60 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.57 | 1.44 | â | 1380 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.77 | 0.78 | â | 437 | â | 427* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.77 | 0.78 | â | 437 | â | 157 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.77 | 0.78 | â | 437 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.67 | 0.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.32 | 0.56 | â | 32 | -0.127 | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.