Ruprecht 130

(VDBH 247; OCL 1034; vdBergh-Hagen 247; ESO 455 41; MWSC 2698; FoF 1205)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.86 UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.77
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 1.0 [pc], 9.7 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.76 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.77 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Ruprecht 130 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Palma et al. (2025)
Classified as optical pair P155, along with HSC_2977.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: invalid due to poor quality CMD. Isochrone match: worst fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.97 (50th percentile).

Hunt & Reffert (2023)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.97 (50th percentile).

Hu et al. (2021)
Ellipticities (core, all): e_core=0.1484, e_all=0.1385.

Morales et al. (2013)
Classified as morphological type 'OC2' (totally exposed cluster without correlation with ATLASGAL emission). Morphological flag: exposed cluster, without submm emission.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 266.9 -30.095 0.384 0.489 -1.852 -0.168
Almeida et al. 2025 266.899 -30.099 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 266.895 -30.098 0.382 0.492 -1.872 0.841
Cavallo et al. 2024 266.898 -30.095 0.381 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 266.895 -30.098 0.382 0.492 -1.872 0.841
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 266.9 -30.098 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 266.901 -30.103 0.417 0.503 -1.812 –
Rain et al. 2021 266.9 -30.098 0.389 0.477 -1.795 –
Dias et al. 2021 266.899 -30.099 0.393 0.482 -1.782 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 266.9 -30.098 0.389 0.477 -1.795 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 266.883 -30.1 – 0.539 -1.732 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 266.9 -30.098 0.389 0.477 -1.795 –
Liu & Pang 2019 266.901 -30.103 0.381 0.365 -1.865 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 266.9 -30.098 – – – -41.84
Bica et al. 2019 266.878 -30.087 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 266.9 -30.098 0.389 0.477 -1.795 –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – 0.06 -1.57 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 266.883 -30.1 – -0.54 -1.74 –
Netopil et al. 2016 266.887 -30.087 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 266.883 -30.1 – -0.8 -2.52 –
Morales et al. 2013 266.883 -30.1 – – – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 266.875 -30.1 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 266.9 -30.117 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 266.883 -30.1 – -0.8 -2.52 –
Lynga 1987 266.902 -30.112 – – – –
van den Bergh & Hagen 1975 266.1 -30.1 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.37 3.39 1.46 106 0.116 484 – 0
Almeida et al. 2025 2.01 2.89 – 403 – 292 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 2.37 3.39 1.46 106 – 1722(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.78 3.66 – 60 -1.050 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.37 3.39 1.46 106 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 2.34 2.76 – 398 – 484 – 0(1)
Jaehnig et al. 2021 2.48(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 2.39 3.79 – 50 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 2.01 2.89 – 403 0.201 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.34 2.76 – 398 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 2.44 2.83 – 589 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.39 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 955 0.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.39 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.39 – – – – – – –
Netopil et al. 2016 5.69 – – 260 – – – –
Morales et al. 2013 2.10 – – 50 – – – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 – 3.79 – 50 – – – 0
van den Bergh 2006 2.10 3.79 – 50 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.10 3.79 – 50 0.030 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️