RSG7
(OCSN 257)
0.37
UTI
0.77
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.65
Clit
0.45
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
30.1 [arcmin]
- CN 0.77 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 0.65 Moderately studied
- Cdup 0.45 Possibly duplicate
Overview
RSG7 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.
â ī¸ Warning: This is possibly a duplicate object, which shares a significant percentage of members with at least one previously reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Very close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 343.994 | 59.448 | 2.35 | 4.944 | -1.812 | -12.62 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 344.19 | 59.363 | 2.337 | 4.927 | -1.865 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 344.357 | 59.397 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | -14.852 | 59.361 | 2.105 | 5.468 | -1.667 | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 343.92 | 59.87 | 2.37 | 4.79 | -2.19 | -9.82 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 342.217 | 59.573 | 2.303 | 5.129 | -1.681 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 344.357 | 59.397 | 2.316 | 5.045 | -1.692 | -10.918 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 344.19 | 59.363 | 2.337 | 4.927 | -1.865 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 344.19 | 59.363 | 2.337 | 4.927 | -1.865 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 344.19 | 59.363 | â | â | â | -11.51 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 344.19 | 59.363 | 2.337 | 4.927 | -1.865 | â |
| Roser et al. | 2016 | 343.98 | 58.66 | â | 5.74 | -0.42 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.42 | 0.65 | â | 27 | -0.048 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.42 | 0.70 | â | 84 | â | 238 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.42 | 0.57 | â | 38 | 0.101 | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.58 | 0.78 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 1.00 | â | 35 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.42 | 0.70 | â | 84 | 0.102 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.42 | 0.57 | â | 39 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.42 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Roser et al. | 2016 | 0.46 | 0.19* | â | 200* | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.