Roslund 6
(OCSN 259)
0.97
UTI
0.87
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
55.6 [arcmin]
- CN 0.87 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Roslund 6 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and age parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a small percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Very close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 307.197 | 39.818 | 2.831 | 5.965 | 2.14 | -8.066 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 307.185 | 39.798 | 2.809 | 5.875 | 2.155 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 307.597 | 40.315 | 2.851 | 6.039 | 2.193 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 307.128 | 39.73 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 307.184 | 39.853 | 2.798 | 5.897 | 2.041 | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 307.593 | 40.356 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 307.593 | 40.356 | 2.831 | 5.95 | 2.13 | -8.082 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 307.179 | 39.765 | 2.833 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 307.593 | 40.356 | 2.831 | 5.95 | 2.13 | -8.082 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 306.702 | 39.676 | â | â | â | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 307.4 | 40.0 | 2.83 | 5.95 | 2.15 | -8.19 |
| He et al. | 2022 | 307.345 | 40.816 | 2.81 | 5.43 | 1.335 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 307.468 | 40.078 | 2.823 | 5.959 | 2.166 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 307.128 | 39.73 | 2.816 | 5.919 | 2.175 | -7.1 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 307.185 | 39.798 | 2.809 | 5.875 | 2.155 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 307.185 | 39.798 | 2.809 | 5.875 | 2.155 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 307.185 | 39.798 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 307.185 | 39.798 | â | â | â | -12.89 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 307.185 | 39.798 | 2.809 | 5.875 | 2.155 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 307.2 | 39.327 | â | -0.733 | -1.132 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 307.204 | 39.327 | â | -0.52 | -4.17 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 307.197 | 39.256 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 307.197 | 39.256 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 307.2 | 39.26 | â | 5.82 | 2.03 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 307.23 | 39.19 | â | 5.71 | 0.33 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 307.204 | 39.327 | â | -0.52 | -4.17 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.36 | 0.18 | â | 94 | 0.048 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 0.40 | 0.21 | â | 65 | 0.250 | 219 | 0.20 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.35 | 0.12 | â | 259 | â | 270 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.38 | 0.00 | â | 68 | 0.080 | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | 0.017* | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 320* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.36 | 0.53 | â | 98 | 0.220 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 0.44 | 168 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.35 | 0.06 | â | 327 | 0.070 | 502* | 0.53 | â |
| Qin et al. | 2023 | 0.39 | 0.25 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.35 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.37 | â | â | 91 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.35 | 0.12 | â | 259 | 0.078 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.38 | 0.00 | â | 89 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.35 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.33 | 0.14 | â | 95 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.35 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.35 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 0.96 | 1.79 | â | 334 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.45 | 0.19 | â | 295 | â | 46* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.45 | 0.19 | â | 295 | â | 14 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.45 | 0.19 | â | 295 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 0.50 | 0.16 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.45 | 0.19 | â | 295 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.