Roslund 4

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.85 UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.86
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 3.6 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.76 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.86 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Roslund 4 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 301.189 29.202 0.423 -2.174 -5.11 -4.256
Hunt & Reffert 2024 301.214 29.191 0.433 -2.231 -5.17 55.191
Celli et al. 2024 301.199 29.196 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 301.105 29.1 0.434 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 301.214 29.191 0.433 -2.231 -5.17 55.191
Jaehnig et al. 2021 301.212 29.188 0.46 -2.168 -5.089 –
Rain et al. 2021 301.199 29.196 0.423 -2.166 -5.057 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 301.199 29.196 0.423 -2.166 -5.057 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 301.199 29.196 0.423 -2.166 -5.057 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 301.199 29.196 0.423 -2.166 -5.057 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 301.23 29.217 – -5.016 -5.668 -15.7
Dias et al. 2014 301.225 29.217 – -2.9 -4.91 –
Gozha et al. 2012 301.225 29.217 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 301.23 29.22 – 0.04 – –
van den Bergh 2006 301.225 29.217 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 301.225 29.217 – -2.9 -4.91 -15.7
Dambis 1999 301.225 29.217 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 918* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 17 – 315 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.18 3.23 – 10 0.270 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.15 3.30 2.73 10 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 2.17* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 2.21 2.82 – 4 – – – 0
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.06 2.33 – 17 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.21 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.21 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.51 2.99 – 34 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 2.00 – – 4 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 2.51 3.07 – 28 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.00 2.82 – 4 – – – –
Dambis 1999 2.19 2.83 – 16 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸