Roslund 3

(MWSC 3213; OCL 121; FoF 2069)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.91 UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 5.5 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.78 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Roslund 3 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 299.699 20.509 0.574 -0.398 -5.158 -9.492
Li et al. 2025 299.695 20.509 0.585 -0.386 -5.108 –
Almeida et al. 2025 299.695 20.51 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 299.699 20.505 0.572 -0.405 -5.153 -2.928
Cavallo et al. 2024 299.71 20.508 0.572 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 299.699 20.505 0.572 -0.405 -5.153 -2.928
Almeida et al. 2023 299.694 20.511 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 299.656 20.512 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 299.697 20.507 0.613 -0.387 -5.122 –
Rain et al. 2021 299.695 20.509 0.585 -0.386 -5.108 –
Dias et al. 2021 299.695 20.51 0.583 -0.376 -5.107 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 299.695 20.509 0.585 -0.386 -5.108 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 299.695 20.509 0.585 -0.386 -5.108 –
Liu & Pang 2019 299.7 20.507 0.579 -0.379 -5.088 –
Bossini et al. 2019 299.695 20.509 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 299.695 20.509 – – – -21.67
Bica et al. 2019 299.684 20.501 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 299.695 20.509 0.585 -0.386 -5.108 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 299.67 20.514 – -2.385 -8.765 -2.6
Kharchenko et al. 2016 299.656 20.512 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 299.675 20.483 – -0.98 -4.74 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 299.662 20.514 – -1.72 -5.35 -2.6
Gozha et al. 2012 299.675 20.483 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 299.668 20.475 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 299.67 20.48 – 0.2 – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 299.668 20.475 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 299.675 20.483 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 299.67 20.48 – -0.7 -3.98 –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 299.67 20.52 – -1.21 -5.29 –
Chen et al. 2003 299.686 20.465 – -1.61 -5.28 -4.7
Dias et al. 2002 299.675 20.483 – -0.98 -4.74 -4.7

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 1.44 0.86 – 233 0.053 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.58 1.08 – 109 – 399 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 793* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.80 1.11 – 56 0.430 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.64 0.97 1.38 75 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.62 1.15 – 105 0.112 496* 0.58 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 50 – 38 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.63* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.63 1.02 – 44 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.58 1.08 – 109 0.197 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.61 0.77 – 54 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.63 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 363 0.250 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 1.74 1.03 – 44 0.000 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.63 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.63 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.52 1.05 – 106 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.58 1.00 – 50 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.58 1.00 – 50 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.47 – – 109 – 724 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 1.51 1.05 – 41 – 519* – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 1.51 1.05 – 41 – 99 – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.47 1.08 – 110 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 1.51 1.05 – 41 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 1.47 1.08 – – – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 1.47 – – 100 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.47 1.08 – 109 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸