Roslund 2
(MWSC 3173; FoF 1275)
0.91
UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
6.4 [arcmin]
- CN 0.78 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Roslund 2 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 296.277 | 23.976 | 0.47 | -1.732 | -5.135 | 15.447 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 296.269 | 23.965 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 296.274 | 23.974 | 0.476 | -1.754 | -5.148 | 28.832 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 296.261 | 23.977 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 296.26 | 23.952 | 0.475 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 296.274 | 23.974 | 0.476 | -1.754 | -5.148 | 28.832 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 296.312 | 23.897 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 296.269 | 23.965 | 0.464 | -1.738 | -5.116 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 296.261 | 23.977 | 0.463 | -1.741 | -5.115 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 296.261 | 23.977 | 0.463 | -1.741 | -5.115 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 296.248 | 23.936 | 0.465 | -1.734 | -5.113 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 296.35 | 23.917 | 0.458 | -1.789 | -5.094 | 107.34 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 296.261 | 23.977 | â | â | â | 126.71 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 296.261 | 23.977 | 0.463 | -1.741 | -5.115 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 296.28 | 23.9 | â | -2.619 | -5.081 | -5.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 296.312 | 23.897 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 296.35 | 23.917 | â | -1.13 | -4.1 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 296.317 | 23.9 | â | -3.3 | -4.34 | -5.0 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 296.35 | 23.917 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 296.346 | 23.915 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 296.35 | 23.92 | â | 0.23 | â | -5.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 296.35 | 23.92 | â | -1.88 | -4.24 | -5.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 296.35 | 23.93 | â | -0.47 | -3.6 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 296.35 | 23.917 | â | -1.13 | -4.1 | 1.0 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.83 | 2.68 | â | 12 | â | 934 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2203* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 12 | â | 730 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.06 | 2.82 | â | 7 | 0.180 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.02 | 3.12 | 2.56 | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 6 | â | 287 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.83 | 2.68 | â | 12 | 0.185 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.09 | 2.74 | â | 11 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.03 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 8 | 0.500 | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 1.37 | 2.76 | â | 13 | -2.028 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.03 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.03 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.94 | 1.72 | â | 562 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.67 | 2.79 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.67 | 2.79 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.67 | â | â | 8 | â | 8913 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 2.00 | 2.79 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 2.00 | 2.79 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.67 | 2.63 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.00 | 2.79 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.