Pismis Moreno 1
(MWSC 3611)
0.88
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.62
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
5.2 [arcmin]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.62 Intermediate quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
Pismis Moreno 1 is a rich, very dense object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 334.632 | 63.225 | 1.08 | -2.348 | -2.295 | -26.402 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 334.678 | 63.243 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 334.645 | 63.205 | 1.05 | -2.4 | -2.299 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 334.629 | 63.231 | 1.082 | -2.396 | -2.382 | -27.962 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 334.695 | 63.251 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 334.614 | 63.185 | 1.077 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 334.629 | 63.231 | 1.082 | -2.396 | -2.382 | -27.962 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 334.622 | 63.221 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 334.6 | 63.218 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 334.647 | 63.185 | 1.079 | -2.341 | -2.333 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 334.678 | 63.243 | 1.033 | -2.286 | -2.283 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 334.695 | 63.251 | 1.051 | -2.301 | -2.251 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 334.695 | 63.251 | 1.051 | -2.301 | -2.251 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 334.7 | 63.267 | 1.057 | -2.286 | -2.25 | 1.65 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 334.695 | 63.251 | 1.051 | -2.301 | -2.251 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 334.605 | 63.218 | â | -0.259 | -3.622 | -23.2 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 334.6 | 63.218 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 334.7 | 63.267 | â | -1.61 | -3.09 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 334.605 | 63.222 | â | 0.8 | -2.52 | -23.2 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 334.7 | 63.267 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 334.605 | 63.222 | â | 0.62 | -2.29 | -23.25 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 334.687 | 63.269 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 334.69 | 63.27 | â | 0.16 | â | -23.25 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 334.7 | 63.267 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 334.69 | 63.27 | â | 0.31 | -0.39 | -23.25 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 334.7 | 63.267 | â | -1.61 | -3.09 | -23.48 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.92 | 1.89 | â | 8 | â | 205 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.98 | 2.06 | â | 11 | -0.012 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 277* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 9 | â | 162 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.94 | 1.68 | â | 6 | 0.260 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.90 | 1.74 | 2.36 | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.89 | 1.90 | â | 11 | 0.054 | 164* | 0.61 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 25 | â | 41 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 2.00 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.92 | 1.89 | â | 8 | -0.012 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.98 | 2.06 | â | 9 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.93 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 0.82 | 1.92 | â | 12 | -0.775 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.93 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.33 | 3.91 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 0.80 | 1.71 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 0.80 | 1.71 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 0.90 | â | â | â | â | 49 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 0.80 | 1.71 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.90 | 1.55 | â | 35 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 0.90 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.90 | 1.55 | â | 35 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 0.80 | 1.71 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.