Pismis 4

(FoF 2289)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.96 UTI
0.79
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 14.1 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.79 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Pismis 4 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 128.797 -44.421 1.446 -8.198 5.355 7.988
Li et al. 2025 128.79 -44.407 1.414 -8.236 5.337 –
Almeida et al. 2025 128.77 -44.391 – – – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 128.829 -44.559 1.419 -8.214 5.408 –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 128.769 -44.404 1.438 -8.224 5.404 8.408
Cavallo et al. 2024 129.037 -44.663 1.445 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 128.769 -44.404 1.438 -8.224 5.404 8.408
Almeida et al. 2023 128.801 -44.446 – – – –
Cordoni et al. 2023 128.77 -44.391 1.407 -8.235 5.343 –
He et al. 2022 128.911 -44.411 1.452 -8.197 5.396 –
Tarricq et al. 2022 128.82 -44.492 1.429 -8.182 5.391 –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 128.723 -44.411 1.449 -8.215 5.35 –
Rain et al. 2021 128.79 -44.407 1.414 -8.236 5.337 –
Dias et al. 2021 128.77 -44.391 1.407 -8.235 5.343 7.334
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 128.79 -44.407 1.414 -8.236 5.337 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 128.79 -44.407 1.414 -8.236 5.337 –
Liu & Pang 2019 128.795 -44.462 1.416 -8.217 5.326 –
Bossini et al. 2019 128.79 -44.407 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 128.79 -44.407 – – – 11.59
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 128.79 -44.407 1.414 -8.236 5.337 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 128.655 -44.417 – -2.68 1.27 27.2
Dias et al. 2014 128.65 -44.417 – -2.68 1.27 –
Gozha et al. 2012 128.65 -44.417 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 128.654 -44.473 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 128.65 -44.42 – 0.4 – 30.0
Piskunov et al. 2007 128.654 -44.473 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 128.675 -44.395 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 128.65 -44.48 – -5.55 5.75 –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 128.67 -44.34 – -6.53 5.64 –
Chen et al. 2003 128.657 -44.409 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 128.65 -44.417 – -2.68 1.27 30.0
Dambis 1999 128.675 -44.395 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 0.68 0.09 0.7 116 -0.089 296 0.39 0.0
Li et al. 2025 0.71 0.22 – 126 0.053 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 0.69 0.29 – 124 – 239 – –
Alfonso et al. 2024 0.69 0.18 – 175 -0.088 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 347(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 0.70 0.43 – 89 0.010 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 0.66 0.13 0.70 116 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 0.68 0.21 – 202 -0.051 235(1) 0.45 –
Cordoni et al. 2023 0.69 0.29 – 124 -0.089 296 0.33 0.00
He et al. 2022 – 0.30 – 79 – – – –
Tarricq et al. 2022 0.68 – – 132 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 0.69(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 0.69 0.09 – 79 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 0.69 0.29 – 124 -0.089 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 0.70 0.18 – 120 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 0.69 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 41 0.000 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 0.66 0.09 – 80 -0.200 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 0.69 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 0.69 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 0.60 0.04 – 34 – – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 0.59 – – 34 -0.110 302 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.59 0.03 – 129 – 317(1) – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 0.59 0.03 – 129 – 121 – –
van den Bergh 2006 0.59 0.03 – 34 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.59 0.03 – 129 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 0.59 0.03 – – – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 0.59 0.04 – 30 -0.200(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 0.59 0.04 – 34 -0.200 – – –
Dambis 1999 0.56 0.03 – 40 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸