Pismis 23

(MWSC 2399)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.78 UTI
0.75
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.7
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 0.7 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.75 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.7 Moderately studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Pismis 23 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by very high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~5.33 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~3.79 kpc).

Distant Very high extinction Massive Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Wood sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 245.991 -48.892 0.188 -2.652 -3.26 -68.591
Hunt & Reffert 2024 245.992 -48.893 0.181 -2.718 -3.334 -38.085
Cavallo et al. 2024 245.979 -48.892 0.185 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 245.992 -48.893 0.181 -2.718 -3.334 -38.085
Just et al. 2023 245.979 -48.894 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 245.99 -48.891 0.166 -2.679 -3.209 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 245.99 -48.891 0.166 -2.679 -3.209 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 245.99 -48.891 0.166 -2.679 -3.209 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 245.979 -48.894 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 245.992 -48.892 – -5.39 -3.33 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 245.991 -48.895 – -7.45 1.19 –
van den Bergh 2006 245.992 -48.892 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 245.992 -48.892 – -5.51 -3.42 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 4613* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 5.40 5.42 – 4 0.160 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 4.75 5.45 2.81 514 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 367 – 78 – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 5.13 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 5.13 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.82 4.52 – 367 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.82 4.52 – 367 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 2.60 6.20 – 302 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.60 6.20 – 302 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸