Pismis 22

(MWSC 2371)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.85 UTI
0.75
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.75
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 1.1 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.75 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.75 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
Pismis 22 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by very high extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, metal-rich, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~6.12 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~3.70 kpc).

Distant Very high extinction Massive Metal-rich Young

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Wood sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 243.542 -51.869 0.164 -3.791 -4.288 42.57
Hunt & Reffert 2024 243.543 -51.873 0.183 -3.797 -4.259 26.919
Cavallo et al. 2024 243.554 -51.867 0.184 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 243.543 -51.873 0.183 -3.797 -4.259 26.919
Just et al. 2023 243.544 -51.864 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 243.552 -51.869 0.102 -3.882 -4.263 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 243.552 -51.869 0.102 -3.882 -4.263 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 243.552 -51.869 – – – -52.58
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 243.552 -51.869 0.102 -3.882 -4.263 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 243.544 -51.864 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 243.538 -51.867 – -2.99 -3.95 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 243.555 -51.865 – -10.73 -3.63 –
van den Bergh 2006 243.537 -51.867 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 243.537 -51.867 – -2.97 -3.31 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 3290* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 3.70 5.43 – 1 0.900 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 4.86 6.45 2.65 50 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 158 – 96 – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 7.65 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 7.65 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 7.65 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.02 5.97 – 158 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.02 5.97 – 158 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.00 6.20 – 40 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.00 6.20 – 40 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸