Pismis 15

(VDBH 74; MWSC 1690; OCL 773; vdBergh-Hagen 74; ESO 212 10; FSR 1480; FoF 394)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.96 UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 3.6 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.81 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
Pismis 15 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Old

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 143.686 -48.048 0.406 -5.265 3.355 34.813
Li et al. 2025 143.684 -48.04 0.354 -5.302 3.329 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 143.656 -48.032 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 143.684 -48.046 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 143.688 -48.04 0.41 -5.26 3.385 32.168
Cavallo et al. 2024 143.656 -48.032 0.409 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 143.688 -48.04 0.41 -5.26 3.385 32.168
Almeida et al. 2023 143.682 -48.046 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 143.683 -48.027 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 143.684 -48.046 0.355 -5.313 3.328 36.123
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 143.684 -48.04 0.354 -5.302 3.329 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 143.688 -48.033 – -5.318 3.329 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 143.684 -48.04 0.354 -5.302 3.329 –
Liu & Pang 2019 143.678 -48.045 0.359 -5.316 3.357 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 143.684 -48.04 – – – 36.28
Bica et al. 2019 143.675 -48.038 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 143.684 -48.04 0.354 -5.302 3.329 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 143.683 -48.027 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 143.688 -48.033 – -4.67 4.9 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 143.688 -48.03 – -6.83 6.38 –
Gozha et al. 2012 143.688 -48.033 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 143.688 -48.033 – -4.67 4.9 –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Li et al. 2025 2.12 2.27 – 1152 -0.055 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – 0.080* – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.87 1.56 – 1811 – 474 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 1527* – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.36 2.51 – 537 0.170 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.25 2.19 1.58 449 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.09 2.18 – 1233 -0.042 554* 0.63 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 1245 – 638 – –
Dias et al. 2021 1.87 1.56 – 1811 0.456 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.56 1.89 – 871 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.61 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 1020 0.500 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.61 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.61 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.56 1.55 – 1245 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.56 1.55 – 1245 -0.400 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 2.90 – – 1288 -0.400 – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.90 1.64 – 1288 -0.380 – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️