Patchick 3

(FSR 0727; SAI 45; MWSC 495; DSH J0516.4+4535; FoF 2034)

0.90 UTI

0.77

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 151

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 12.0 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.77 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

Patchick 3 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Old

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: worst fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for Patchick 3 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	79.119	45.582	0.582	-1.677	-1.325	-34.132
Li et al.	2025	79.12	45.584	0.561	-1.609	-1.288	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	79.095	45.586	–	–	–	–
Wei et al.	2025	79.013	45.539	0.597	-1.603	-1.311	–
Almeida et al.	2025	79.122	45.588	–	–	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	79.121	45.582	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	79.121	45.582	0.583	-1.683	-1.319	-36.77
Cavallo et al.	2024	79.095	45.586	0.582	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	79.121	45.582	0.583	-1.683	-1.319	-36.77
Almeida et al.	2023	79.11	45.583	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	79.137	45.605	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	79.122	45.588	0.561	-1.6	-1.279	-31.301
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	79.12	45.584	0.561	-1.609	-1.288	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	79.12	45.584	0.561	-1.609	-1.288	–
Liu & Pang	2019	79.09	45.594	0.572	-1.585	-1.248	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	79.12	45.584	–	–	–	-31.02
Bica et al.	2019	79.105	45.585	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	79.12	45.584	0.561	-1.609	-1.288	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	79.137	45.605	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	79.147	45.605	–	-2.26	-3.21	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	79.147	45.605	–	-2.26	-3.21	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	79.146	45.582	–	–	–	–
Froebrich et al.	2007	79.129	45.592	–	–	–	–
Kronberger et al.	2006	79.102	45.589	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.69	1.43	0.59	1259	-0.139	487	0.6	–
Li et al.	2025	1.73	1.18	–	1519	-0.154	–	–	–
Hu & Soubiran	2025	–	–	–	–	-0.170⁽⁵⁾	–	–	–
Wei et al.	2025	4.16	1.69	–	513	0.500	752	0.51	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.63	1.43	–	1259	–	196	–	–
Zhang et al.	2024	–	–	–	–	-0.068⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	487⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.66	1.03	–	1259	0.310	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.64	1.00	0.59	1161	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	1.59	1.36	–	1384	-0.123	213⁽¹⁾	0.69	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	804	–	719	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	1.63	1.43	–	1259	-0.162	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.69	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	2190	-0.500	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	1.69	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.69	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	2.99	2.13	–	804	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	2.99	2.13	–	804	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	2.99	2.13	–	804	–	–	–	–
Glushkova et al.	2010	1.29	0.78	–	1585	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3