NGC 869
(MWSC 175)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
46.4 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 869 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 34.751 | 57.138 | 0.403 | -0.664 | -1.13 | -50.337 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 34.741 | 57.134 | 0.399 | -0.689 | -1.082 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 34.744 | 57.136 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 34.766 | 57.14 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 34.766 | 57.14 | 0.404 | -0.654 | -1.143 | -67.639 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 34.741 | 57.134 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 34.735 | 57.132 | 0.403 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 34.766 | 57.14 | 0.404 | -0.654 | -1.143 | -67.639 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 34.728 | 57.143 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 35.09 | 57.142 | 0.424 | -0.652 | -1.079 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 34.741 | 57.134 | 0.399 | -0.689 | -1.082 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 34.744 | 57.136 | 0.4 | -0.682 | -1.077 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 34.741 | 57.134 | 0.399 | -0.689 | -1.082 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 34.741 | 57.134 | 0.399 | -0.689 | -1.082 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 34.741 | 57.134 | â | â | â | -62.82 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 34.741 | 57.134 | 0.399 | -0.689 | -1.082 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 34.755 | 57.129 | â | -0.738 | -0.15 | -41.8 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 34.728 | 57.143 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 34.75 | 57.128 | â | -1.42 | -0.95 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 34.74 | 57.145 | â | -2.81 | 0.05 | -41.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 34.75 | 57.128 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 34.74 | 57.145 | â | -2.81 | 0.05 | -41.77 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 34.759 | 57.149 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 34.75 | 57.13 | â | 1.75 | â | -39.84 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 34.775 | 57.15 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 34.77 | 57.15 | â | -0.49 | -0.9 | -39.82 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 34.77 | 57.15 | â | -0.56 | 1.46 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 34.719 | 57.178 | â | -0.92 | -1.66 | -53.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 34.75 | 57.128 | â | -0.92 | -1.66 | -42.84 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 34.75 | 57.128 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.25 | 1.75 | 0.81 | 15 | -0.200 | 4596 | â | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.26 | 1.68 | â | 17 | 0.051 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.25 | 1.75 | â | 13 | â | 4596 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.074(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 2402(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 15 | â | 3679 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.65 | 1.77 | â | 15 | 0.080 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.36 | 1.58 | 0.81 | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 19 | â | 7816 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.39(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.34 | 1.77 | â | 11 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.25 | 1.75 | â | 13 | -0.100 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.20 | 1.69 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.34 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.34 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.34 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.09 | 1.77 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.30 | 1.62 | â | 19 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.30 | 1.62 | â | 19 | -0.300 | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.08 | â | â | 12 | -0.300 | 1047129 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.30 | 1.62 | â | 19 | -0.300 | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 2.08 | 1.49 | â | 19 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.08 | 1.80 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 2.08 | 1.49 | â | 19 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 2.08 | 1.80 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 2.08 | â | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.08 | 1.78 | â | 12 | -0.300 | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.87 | 1.75 | â | 3 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.