NGC 7708

(MWSC 3745)

0.28 UTI

0.42

C_N

0.05

C_dens

0.38

C_C3

0.29

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 42

Core radius and density 3.5 [pc], 0.2 [pc^-2]

C3 classification BC

C_N 0.42 Poorly populated
C_dens 0.05 Very loose
C_C3 0.38 Low quality
C_lit 0.29 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 7708 is a poorly populated, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, well above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as an intermediate-age cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.94 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.95 kpc).

Relatively close Moderate extinction Intermediate age

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 7708 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	354.051	72.877	0.202	-3.053	-0.315	-60.833
Just et al.	2023	354.067	72.848	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	-1.83	0.72	–
Dib et al.	2018	354.075	72.851	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	354.06	72.848	–	-0.468	-0.237	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	354.125	72.85	–	-2.69	-1.48	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	354.067	72.848	–	–	–	–
Tadross	2014	353.754	72.833	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	354.125	72.85	–	-2.48	-1.65	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	354.075	72.851	–	-2.39	1.04	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	354.075	72.851	–	-2.39	1.04	–
Dias et al.	2002	354.125	72.85	–	-2.48	-1.65	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.95	1.875	–	575	–	345	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	575	–	345	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	1.95	–	–	575	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.88	0.84	–	1023	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.95	2.43	–	575	–	–	–	–
Tadross	2014	1.61	1.32	–	2000	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.95	2.43	–	575	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2012	1.95	2.43	–	575	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.61	1.32	–	1995	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️