NGC 7086

(Collinder 437; MWSC 3520; OCL 214; FSR 0309; FoF 343)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 94.9 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
NGC 7086 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.94 (50th percentile).

Richer et al. (2021)
The expected number of WDs is 46.0, 0 WD candidates found, and 0 WD candidates found in the wide search.

Piecka & Paunzen (2021)
Belongs to cluster aggregate 'Agg28' along with FSR 0306.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 322.623 51.593 0.598 -1.654 -1.659 -19.182
Bijavara Seshashayana et al. 2025 322.589 51.61 – – – –
Wei et al. 2025 322.622 51.593 0.599 -1.652 -1.671 –
Almeida et al. 2025 322.624 51.589 – – – –
Zhang et al. 2024 322.628 51.595 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 322.628 51.595 0.6 -1.652 -1.664 -16.098
Cavallo et al. 2024 322.629 51.586 0.6 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 322.628 51.595 0.6 -1.652 -1.664 -16.098
Almeida et al. 2023 322.606 51.592 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 322.607 51.604 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 322.626 51.599 0.621 -1.655 -1.623 –
Rain et al. 2021 322.624 51.593 0.59 -1.656 -1.629 –
Richer et al. 2021 322.634 51.599 0.586 -1.649 -1.63 –
Dias et al. 2021 322.624 51.589 0.586 -1.644 -1.626 -17.964
Spina et al. 2021 322.624 51.594 0.589 -1.649 -1.621 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 322.624 51.593 0.59 -1.656 -1.629 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 322.613 51.6 – -1.539 -1.74 –
Zhong et al. 2020 322.624 51.593 – -1.656 -1.629 -31.476
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 322.624 51.593 0.59 -1.656 -1.629 –
Liu & Pang 2019 322.623 51.588 0.587 -1.649 -1.642 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 322.624 51.593 – – – -22.34
Bica et al. 2019 322.627 51.581 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 322.624 51.593 0.59 -1.656 -1.629 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 322.607 51.604 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 322.612 51.6 – -2.3 -0.1 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 322.612 51.608 – -3.2 2.04 -5.6
Gozha et al. 2012 322.612 51.6 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 322.612 51.608 – -3.2 2.04 -5.6
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 322.65 51.59 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 322.6 51.6 – 0.1 – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 322.625 51.6 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 322.625 51.583 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 322.627 51.581 – 0.98 0.22 -5.6
Dias et al. 2002 322.613 51.6 – 0.98 0.22 -18.95
Dambis 1999 322.612 51.6 – – – –
Lynga 1987 322.638 51.588 – – – –
Sulentic et al. 1973 322.639 51.594 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.6 2.33 2.43 138 0.006 2649 0.52 2
Bijavara Seshashayana et al. 2025 – 1.81 – 190 -0.130(14) – – –
Wei et al. 2025 1.90 1.83 – 162 0.500 2234 0.44 –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.59 2.10 – 95 – 3064 – –
Zhang et al. 2024 – – – – -0.078(1) – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 4293(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.85 2.30 – 155 0.490 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.58 2.22 2.43 98 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.55 2.33 – 55 -0.005 2152(1) 0.60 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 116 – 71 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.60(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.62 2.52 – 138 – – – 0
Richer et al. 2021 – 2.46 – 140 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 1.59 2.10 – 95 0.174 – – –
Spina et al. 2021 1.71 – – 195 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.67 1.81 – 195 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 1.63 2.00 – 174 – – – –
Zhong et al. 2020 1.62(1) 2.43 – 8065 0.018 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.62 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 234 -1.250 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.62 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.62 – – – – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.60 2.43 – 116 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.60 2.43 – 116 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 6265 – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.30 – – 139 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 1.60 2.43 – 116 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 1.22(1) 2.11 – 112 – – – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 – 2.56 – 138 – – – 5
van den Bergh 2006 1.30 2.56 – 138 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 1.30 – – 130 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.30 2.55 – 139 – – – –
Dambis 1999 0.94 2.78 – 79 – – – –
Lynga 1987 1.20 2.08 – 85 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️