NGC 6728
(MWSC 3032; FoF 2067)
0.97
UTI
0.83
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
7.5 [arcmin]
- CN 0.83 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 6728 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 284.714 | -8.958 | 0.533 | 1.315 | -1.784 | 10.483 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 284.715 | -8.953 | 0.536 | 1.312 | -1.76 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 284.718 | -8.946 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 284.691 | -8.956 | 0.538 | 1.323 | -1.799 | 9.353 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 284.716 | -8.959 | 0.538 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 284.691 | -8.956 | 0.538 | 1.323 | -1.799 | 9.353 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 284.712 | -8.942 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 284.677 | -8.966 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 284.718 | -8.946 | 0.54 | 1.308 | -1.755 | 11.855 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 284.715 | -8.953 | 0.536 | 1.312 | -1.76 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 284.715 | -8.953 | 0.536 | 1.312 | -1.76 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 284.701 | -8.957 | 0.549 | 1.278 | -1.764 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 284.715 | -8.953 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 284.715 | -8.953 | â | â | â | 11.51 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 284.701 | -8.966 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 284.715 | -8.953 | 0.536 | 1.312 | -1.76 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 284.685 | -8.97 | â | 0.487 | -6.689 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 284.677 | -8.966 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 284.683 | -8.97 | â | -0.78 | -5.95 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 284.685 | -8.965 | â | 1.92 | -2.1 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 284.674 | -8.975 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 284.68 | -8.97 | â | 2.25 | -0.8 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 284.683 | -8.97 | â | -0.78 | -5.95 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.61 | 0.78 | â | 725 | -0.040 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.56 | 0.87 | â | 625 | â | 757 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1282* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.78 | 1.08 | â | 407 | 0.150 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.75 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 530 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.70 | 0.88 | â | 578 | 0.122 | 1170* | 0.49 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 891 | â | 60 | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.56 | 0.87 | â | 625 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.83 | 0.84 | â | 603 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.77 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 676 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.61 | 0.71 | â | 586 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.77 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.77 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 3.34 | 1.26 | â | 100 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.13 | 0.39 | â | 891 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.13 | 0.39 | â | 891 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.00 | 0.46 | â | 851 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.00 | 0.46 | â | 851 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.00 | 0.46 | â | 851 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Dias et al. (2002)
Asterism (Archinal, B. A. & Hynes, S. J. 2003)