NGC 6611
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
3.4 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 6611 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with 3 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 274.68 | -13.788 | 0.545 | 0.2 | -1.618 | 10.632 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 274.695 | -13.802 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 274.675 | -13.79 | 0.54 | 0.228 | -1.608 | 20.115 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 274.688 | -13.792 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 274.711 | -13.819 | 0.547 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 274.675 | -13.79 | 0.54 | 0.228 | -1.608 | 20.115 |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 274.688 | -13.792 | 0.575 | 0.203 | -1.549 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 274.688 | -13.792 | 0.566 | 0.178 | -1.576 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 274.695 | -13.802 | 0.559 | 0.198 | -1.56 | -16.374 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 274.688 | -13.792 | 0.566 | 0.178 | -1.576 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 274.688 | -13.792 | 0.566 | 0.178 | -1.576 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 274.688 | -13.792 | â | â | â | 3.7 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 274.688 | -13.792 | 0.566 | 0.178 | -1.576 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 274.68 | -13.78 | â | 0.484 | -0.908 | 18.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 274.7 | -13.807 | â | -1.49 | -1.12 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 274.7 | -13.807 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 274.687 | -13.816 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 274.69 | -13.81 | â | 0.22 | â | 18.0 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 274.687 | -13.816 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 274.7 | -13.817 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 274.69 | -13.81 | â | 1.6 | -0.35 | 18.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 274.68 | -13.8 | â | 1.19 | 1.76 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 274.716 | -13.763 | â | 2.09 | -0.9 | 23.5 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 274.7 | -13.807 | â | -1.49 | -1.12 | 10.0 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 274.7 | -13.807 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.58 | 2.15 | â | 10 | â | 909 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 3519* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 2 | â | 1697 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.56 | 2.67 | â | 8 | -0.350 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.72 | 2.51 | 2.92 | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.76* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.68 | 2.48 | â | 1 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.58 | 2.15 | â | 10 | 0.066 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.68 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.68 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.68 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.72 | 2.37 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.80 | â | â | 1 | -0.460 | 1000 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.72 | 2.17 | â | 5 | â | 1368* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 1.72 | 2.17 | â | 5 | â | 255 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.75 | 2.42 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.72 | 2.17 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 2.00 | 2.02 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 1.75 | â | â | 0 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.80 | 2.48 | â | 1 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.74 | 2.11 | â | 3 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Bronze sample.