NGC 654
(MWSC 137)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.6 [arcmin]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 654 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the mass parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Massive
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 26.005 | 61.886 | 0.323 | -1.137 | -0.32 | -30.49 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 26.007 | 61.879 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 26.001 | 61.888 | 0.325 | -1.147 | -0.325 | -20.61 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 26.008 | 61.883 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 25.98 | 61.868 | 0.324 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 26.001 | 61.888 | 0.325 | -1.147 | -0.325 | -20.61 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 25.984 | 61.897 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 26.011 | 61.886 | 0.344 | -1.093 | -0.266 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 26.008 | 61.883 | 0.313 | -1.086 | -0.265 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 26.007 | 61.879 | 0.315 | -1.105 | -0.26 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 26.008 | 61.883 | 0.313 | -1.086 | -0.265 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 26.008 | 61.883 | 0.313 | -1.086 | -0.265 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 26.008 | 61.883 | 0.313 | -1.086 | -0.265 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 25.995 | 61.885 | â | 0.143 | -0.81 | -38.8 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 25.984 | 61.897 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 26.0 | 61.885 | â | -0.96 | -1.51 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 25.995 | 61.9 | â | 0.9 | -3.36 | -38.8 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 26.0 | 61.885 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 25.995 | 61.9 | â | 0.92 | -3.09 | -38.79 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 25.99 | 61.873 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 25.99 | 61.88 | â | 0.11 | â | -38.79 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 26.0 | 61.883 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 25.99 | 61.88 | â | -1.34 | 0.49 | -38.79 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 25.96 | 61.85 | â | -0.84 | 0.78 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 26.019 | 61.84 | â | -1.34 | -0.72 | -33.8 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 26.0 | 61.885 | â | -1.34 | -0.72 | -34.2 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 26.0 | 61.885 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.52 | 2.60 | â | 15 | â | 2207 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 3819* | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 10 | â | 2548 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.13 | 2.62 | â | 25 | 0.760 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.81 | 2.84 | 2.31 | 19 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 18 | â | 256 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.89* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.92 | 2.54 | â | 10 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.52 | 2.60 | â | 15 | -0.100 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 3.12 | 2.29 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.92 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.92 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.06 | 2.68 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.79 | 2.33 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.79 | 2.33 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.41 | â | â | 10 | -0.680 | 126 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.05 | 2.39 | â | 50 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 2.04 | 2.70 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.04 | 2.70 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 2.04 | 2.70 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 2.04 | 2.63 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 2.04 | â | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.41 | 2.54 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 2.45 | 2.90 | â | 13 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.