NGC 6514

0.41 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.17

C_dens

0.5

C_C3

0.7

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification BB

Number of members (P>50%) 16

Radius (P>50% members) 4.6 [arcmin]

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.17 Very loose
C_C3 0.5 Intermediate quality
C_lit 0.7 Moderately studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 6514 is a sparse, very loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a young cluster (see Parameters). It is moderately studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~3.20 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~0.82 kpc).

Close Low extinction Young

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 6514 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	270.8	-22.945	0.313	-0.149	-1.7	-29.438
Jaehnig et al.	2021	270.656	-22.889	0.852	0.325	-1.699	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	270.675	-22.973	–	3.1	-0.21	-2.1
Dias et al.	2014	270.675	-22.972	–	-0.77	-0.7	–
Gozha et al.	2012	270.675	-22.972	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	270.665	-22.973	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	270.67	-22.97	–	0.23	–	-2.13
van den Bergh	2006	270.596	-23.03	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	270.67	-22.97	–	2.63	-1.01	-2.13
Kharchenko et al.	2003	270.58	-23.02	–	0.63	-2.75	–
Chen et al.	2003	270.641	-23.053	–	-0.42	-3.02	-22.0
Dias et al.	2002	270.675	-22.972	–	-0.77	-0.7	-0.83
Dambis	1999	270.675	-22.972	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Jaehnig et al.	2021	1.18*	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	0.82	0.59	–	23	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	0.82	–	–	23	–	138	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.82	0.59	–	19	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	0.82	0.59	–	23	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.82	0.59	–	19	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	0.82	0.59	–	–	–	–	–	–
Chen et al.	2003	0.82	–	–	20	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.82	0.59	–	23	–	–	–	–
Dambis	1999	0.83	0.66	–	8	–	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️