NGC 6383

(FoF 2107)

0.92 UTI

0.86

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 396

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 143.4 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.86 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 6383 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 6383 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	263.664	-32.573	0.875	2.536	-1.724	4.569
Li et al.	2025	263.673	-32.573	0.873	2.596	-1.708	–
Almeida et al.	2025	263.657	-32.573	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	263.673	-32.577	0.886	2.529	-1.705	10.215
Celli et al.	2024	263.673	-32.573	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	263.645	-32.565	0.882	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	263.673	-32.577	0.886	2.529	-1.705	10.215
He et al.	2022	263.676	-32.575	0.883	2.541	-1.747	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	263.667	-32.574	0.925	2.625	-1.657	–
Rain et al.	2021	263.673	-32.573	0.873	2.596	-1.708	–
Dias et al.	2021	263.657	-32.573	0.881	2.589	-1.662	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	263.673	-32.573	0.873	2.596	-1.708	–
Sánchez et al.	2020	263.7	-32.567	–	2.743	-1.518	–
Donor et al.	2020	263.685	-32.577	–	2.61	-1.84	7.7
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	263.673	-32.573	0.873	2.596	-1.708	–
Liu & Pang	2019	263.653	-32.571	0.932	2.545	-1.642	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	263.673	-32.573	–	–	–	-54.74
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	263.673	-32.573	0.873	2.596	-1.708	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	263.7	-32.567	–	-0.435	-3.709	2.7
Dias et al.	2014	263.7	-32.567	–	0.37	-1.34	–
Gozha et al.	2012	263.7	-32.567	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	263.685	-32.57	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	263.7	-32.57	–	0.25	–	2.67
Piskunov et al.	2007	263.685	-32.57	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	263.7	-32.567	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	263.7	-32.57	–	1.66	-1.56	3.75
Kharchenko et al.	2003	263.62	-32.58	–	2.13	-1.84	–
Chen et al.	2003	263.26	-33.03	–	3.22	-0.84	7.0
Dias et al.	2002	263.7	-32.567	–	0.37	-1.34	2.67
Dambis	1999	263.7	-32.567	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.07	1.015	2.0	5	-0.230	566	–	0.0
Li et al.	2025	1.25	1.22	–	3	-0.365	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.09	1.20	–	12	–	1038	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	902⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	4	–	724	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.03	1.59	–	4	-0.230	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.09	1.21	2.00	4	–	–	–	–
He et al.	2022	–	1.40	–	4	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	1.07⁽¹⁾	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	1.11	0.90	–	9	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	1.09	1.20	–	12	0.004	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.12	1.30	–	4	–	–	–	–
Donor et al.	2020	–	–	–	–	-0.390	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.11	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	7	0.000	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	1.11	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.11	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	0.98	0.92	–	9	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	0.98	–	–	9	–	407	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.98	0.93	–	5	–	269⁽¹⁾	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2007	0.98	0.93	–	5	–	59	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	0.98	0.93	–	9	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.98	0.93	–	5	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	0.98	0.93	–	–	–	–	–	–
Chen et al.	2003	0.98	–	–	0	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.98	0.92	–	9	–	–	–	–
Dambis	1999	1.19	1.10	–	3	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3