NGC 637
(MWSC 133)
0.95
UTI
0.76
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
2.2 [arcmin]
- CN 0.76 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 637 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Relatively close
Moderate extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Very young
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 25.782 | 64.04 | 0.345 | -1.257 | -0.024 | â |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 25.775 | 64.038 | 0.338 | -1.204 | 0.026 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 25.77 | 64.037 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 25.771 | 64.041 | 0.343 | -1.264 | -0.037 | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 25.76 | 64.043 | 0.345 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 25.771 | 64.041 | 0.343 | -1.264 | -0.037 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 25.774 | 64.041 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 25.766 | 64.043 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 25.775 | 64.039 | 0.367 | -1.222 | 0.055 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 25.775 | 64.038 | 0.338 | -1.204 | 0.026 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 25.77 | 64.037 | 0.341 | -1.212 | 0.02 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 25.775 | 64.038 | 0.338 | -1.204 | 0.026 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 25.775 | 64.038 | 0.338 | -1.204 | 0.026 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 25.775 | 64.038 | 0.338 | -1.204 | 0.026 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 25.77 | 64.04 | â | -0.143 | -0.647 | -39.1 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 25.766 | 64.043 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 25.767 | 64.04 | â | -1.28 | 0.38 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 25.777 | 64.045 | â | -0.25 | -2.0 | -39.1 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 25.767 | 64.04 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 25.777 | 64.045 | â | -1.16 | -1.7 | -39.1 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 25.753 | 64.039 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 25.77 | 64.04 | â | 0.1 | â | -39.1 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 25.775 | 64.033 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 25.77 | 64.04 | â | 0.34 | -2.2 | -39.1 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 25.78 | 64.05 | â | 1.06 | -2.91 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 25.767 | 64.04 | â | -1.28 | 0.38 | -45.58 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.33 | 1.95 | â | 15 | -0.134 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.52 | 1.92 | â | 14 | â | 394 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1259* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 2.86 | 1.91 | â | 18 | 0.450 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.63 | 1.81 | 1.02 | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 2.32 | 1.96 | â | 18 | -0.003 | 430* | 0.54 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 5 | â | 220 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.71* | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.73 | 1.98 | â | 10 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.52 | 1.92 | â | 14 | 0.096 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.50 | 1.67 | â | 38 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.73 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.73 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.18 | 1.93 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.30 | 1.81 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.30 | 1.81 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.16 | â | â | 10 | â | 85 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2012 | 2.50 | 1.89 | â | 20 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 2.16 | 1.89 | â | 16 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.16 | 1.95 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 2.16 | 1.89 | â | 16 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 2.17 | 1.86 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.50 | 1.98 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.