NGC 6322

0.84 UTI

0.45

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 45

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 24.0 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.45 Poorly populated
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 6322 is a poorly populated, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Moderate extinction Near-solar metallicity Very young

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 6322 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	259.61	-42.941	0.765	0.099	-2.297	30.876
Almeida et al.	2025	259.63	-42.94	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	259.612	-42.94	0.769	0.003	-2.257	-0.093
Celli et al.	2024	259.625	-42.937	–	–	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	259.602	-42.94	0.769	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	259.612	-42.94	0.769	0.003	-2.257	-0.093
Jaehnig et al.	2021	259.603	-42.932	0.787	0.162	-2.228	–
Rain et al.	2021	259.625	-42.937	0.728	0.183	-2.272	–
Dias et al.	2021	259.63	-42.94	0.733	0.159	-2.295	-40.338
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	259.625	-42.937	0.728	0.183	-2.272	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	259.625	-42.937	0.728	0.183	-2.272	–
Dias et al.	2019	259.625	-42.937	0.728	0.183	-2.272	-40.338
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	259.625	-42.937	0.728	0.183	-2.272	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	259.605	-42.934	–	-0.216	-4.684	-57.0
Dias et al.	2014	259.604	-42.933	–	1.4	-1.83	–
Gozha et al.	2012	259.604	-42.933	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	259.598	-42.929	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	259.6	-42.93	–	0.12	–	-57.0
van den Bergh	2006	259.6	-42.933	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	259.6	-42.93	–	1.3	-1.8	-57.0
Kharchenko et al.	2003	259.62	-42.95	–	1.48	-1.43	–
Dias et al.	2002	259.604	-42.933	–	0.92	-0.48	-57.0
Dambis	1999	259.604	-42.933	–	–	–	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.21	1.83	2.38	11	0.112	365	–	0.0
Almeida et al.	2025	1.31	2.07	–	11	–	405	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	413⁽¹⁾	–	–
Celli et al.	2024	–	–	–	15	–	325	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.18	2.06	–	18	0.140	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.24	1.88	2.38	6	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	1.28⁽¹⁾	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	1.32	1.83	–	11	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	1.31	2.07	–	11	0.008	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.37	1.92	–	15	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.32	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2019	1.50	1.83	–	9	0.112	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.32	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	0.99	1.82	–	12	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	1.00	–	–	11	–	35	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.99	1.64	–	14	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	1.00	1.83	–	11	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.99	1.64	–	14	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	0.96	1.55	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.00	1.83	–	11	–	–	–	–
Dambis	1999	1.00	2.16	–	3	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3