NGC 6231
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
N50 (P>50% members)
1024
Stellar density (N50/rad)
141.1 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 6231 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with 2 later reported entries. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 253.556 | -41.828 | 0.605 | -0.576 | -2.179 | -27.671 |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 253.545 | -41.745 | 0.604 | -0.588 | -2.091 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 253.535 | -41.801 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 253.571 | -41.836 | 0.608 | -0.576 | -2.184 | -30.795 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 253.545 | -41.812 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 253.56 | -41.828 | 0.607 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 253.571 | -41.836 | 0.608 | -0.576 | -2.184 | -30.795 |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 253.544 | -41.803 | 0.621 | -0.578 | -2.096 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 253.545 | -41.812 | 0.589 | -0.529 | -2.177 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 253.535 | -41.801 | 0.598 | -0.533 | -2.162 | -28.186 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 253.545 | -41.812 | 0.589 | -0.529 | -2.177 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 253.545 | -41.812 | 0.589 | -0.529 | -2.177 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 253.542 | -41.825 | 0.591 | -0.569 | -2.164 | -28.47 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 253.545 | -41.812 | â | â | â | -39.88 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 253.545 | -41.812 | 0.589 | -0.529 | -2.177 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 253.545 | -41.825 | â | -0.707 | -0.283 | -28.5 |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 253.542 | -41.825 | â | -0.89 | -1.79 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 253.542 | -41.825 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 253.542 | -41.831 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 253.54 | -41.83 | â | 0.22 | â | -27.28 |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 253.535 | -41.827 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 253.56 | -41.83 | â | -0.39 | -1.99 | -27.28 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 253.56 | -41.83 | â | -1.45 | -0.96 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 253.555 | -41.787 | â | -0.34 | -2.32 | -25.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 253.542 | -41.825 | â | -0.89 | -1.79 | -27.54 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 253.535 | -41.827 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.41 | 1.36 | 1.69 | 7 | 0.110 | 3199 | 0.55 | 0.0 |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 2.63 | 1.80 | â | 9 | 0.500 | 7185 | 0.55 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.43 | 1.53 | â | 9 | â | 3080 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 4210(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 14 | â | 3199 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.31 | 1.48 | â | 9 | 0.050 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.56 | 1.53 | 1.69 | 4 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.64(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.62 | 1.33 | â | 7 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.43 | 1.53 | â | 9 | 0.110 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.47 | 1.07 | â | 14 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 0.99 | 1.55 | â | 12 | -1.623 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.25 | 1.35 | â | 7 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.24 | â | â | 7 | 0.260 | 661 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.25 | 1.36 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.24 | 1.36 | â | 7 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.25 | 1.36 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.24 | 1.36 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 1.24 | â | â | 0 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.24 | 1.36 | â | 7 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.41 | 1.45 | â | 3 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.