NGC 6192

(Melotte 149; Collinder 309; VDBH 194; MWSC 2440; OCL 988; vdBergh-Hagen 194; ESO 277 03; FoF 437)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 130.0 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
NGC 6192 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD classes: 1.00 (50th percentile), true positive (human-assigned).

Rain et al. (2021)
This cluster was include in (Dias et al., 2002A&A...389..871D, Cat. B/ocl) however, parameters log(t)=8.251, Av=1.731, [Fe/H]=0.120 were taken from Bossini et al. (2019A&A...623A.108B, Cat. J/A+A/623/A108).

Ahumada & Lapasset (2007)
The dereddened colour-magnitude diagram of (1987Obs...107..107K) was examined.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 250.072 -43.354 0.587 1.631 -0.202 -5.176
Li et al. 2025 250.077 -43.355 0.571 1.653 -0.188 –
Wei et al. 2025 250.082 -43.359 0.59 1.621 -0.237 –
Almeida et al. 2025 250.073 -43.358 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 250.075 -43.356 0.592 1.629 -0.209 -7.453
Cavallo et al. 2024 250.073 -43.355 0.591 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 250.075 -43.356 0.592 1.629 -0.209 -7.453
Almeida et al. 2023 250.08 -43.361 – – – –
Angelo et al. 2023 250.071 -43.368 – 1.63 -0.21 –
Just et al. 2023 250.077 -43.36 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 250.077 -43.355 0.599 1.653 -0.196 –
Rain et al. 2021 250.077 -43.355 0.571 1.653 -0.188 –
Dias et al. 2021 250.073 -43.358 0.572 1.663 -0.17 -7.786
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 250.077 -43.355 0.571 1.653 -0.188 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 250.096 -43.367 – 1.57 0.003 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 250.077 -43.355 0.571 1.653 -0.188 –
Liu & Pang 2019 250.077 -43.355 0.578 1.651 -0.187 –
Bossini et al. 2019 250.077 -43.355 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 250.077 -43.355 – – – -7.81
Bica et al. 2019 250.091 -43.374 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 250.077 -43.355 0.571 1.653 -0.188 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 250.095 -43.368 – -1.419 -2.618 -7.7
Kharchenko et al. 2016 250.077 -43.36 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 250.096 -43.367 – 1.42 1.01 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 250.087 -43.36 – 1.15 -0.6 -7.7
Gozha et al. 2012 250.096 -43.367 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 250.081 -43.367 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 250.09 -43.37 – 0.17 – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 250.075 -43.367 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 250.1 -43.367 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 250.09 -43.37 – 1.8 -0.77 –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 250.12 -43.36 – 1.96 -1.24 –
Dias et al. 2002 250.096 -43.367 – 3.73 3.18 -7.93
Dambis 1999 250.096 -43.367 – – – –
Lynga 1987 250.101 -43.366 – – – –
van den Bergh & Hagen 1975 249.2 -43.267 – – – –
Sulentic et al. 1973 250.094 -43.381 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.58 2.02 1.82 141 0.120 1840 0.555 0
Li et al. 2025 1.51 1.89 – 240 0.155 – – –
Wei et al. 2025 3.09 2.53 – 245 -0.250 2354 0.52 –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.57 2.12 – 85 – 2572 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 4143(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.70 2.26 – 219 0.390 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.58 2.03 1.82 151 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.55 2.22 – 48 0.140 1840(1) 0.59 –
Angelo et al. 2023 1.51 2.33 – 158 0.050 4(1) – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 141 – 719 – –
Spina et al. 2022 – – – – -0.106 – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.66(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.67 1.74 – 178 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.57 2.12 – 85 0.225 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.74 1.57 – 240 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 1.72 2.06 – 219 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.67 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 245 -0.250 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 1.75 1.73 – 178 0.120 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.67 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.67 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.58 1.99 – 142 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.62 2.00 – 141 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.62 2.00 – 141 0.120 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.55 – – 135 0.120 631 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 1.55 2.02 – 135 – – – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 – 2.02 – 135 – – – 0
van den Bergh 2006 1.55 2.02 – 135 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 1.55 2.02 – 135 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 1.55 2.02 – – – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.55 2.01 – 135 0.120 – – –
Dambis 1999 1.12 1.97 – 79 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️