NGC 5593

(MWSC 2217; OCL 926; ESO 175 08; FoF 2345)

0.95 UTI

0.77

C_N

1.0

C_dens

1.0

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

C3 classification AA

Number of members (P>50%) 161

Radius (P>50% members) 8.3 [arcmin]

C_N 0.77 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 1.0 Very high quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 5593 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 5593 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	–	216.4	-54.795	0.956	-5.815	-2.049	-31.016
Li et al.	2025	216.419	-54.795	0.947	-5.806	-2.078	–
Almeida et al.	2025	216.411	-54.786	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	216.439	-54.783	0.948	-5.826	-2.046	-29.708
Cavallo et al.	2024	216.388	-54.79	0.95	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	216.439	-54.783	0.948	-5.826	-2.046	-29.708
Almeida et al.	2023	216.426	-54.801	–	–	–	–
Just et al.	2023	216.394	-54.798	–	–	–	–
He et al.	2022	216.448	-54.777	0.956	-5.81	-2.06	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	216.264	-54.79	0.969	-5.808	-2.056	–
Dias et al.	2021	216.411	-54.786	0.954	-5.821	-2.072	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	216.419	-54.795	0.947	-5.806	-2.078	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	216.419	-54.795	0.947	-5.806	-2.078	–
Liu & Pang	2019	216.389	-54.793	0.944	-5.802	-2.042	–
Bica et al.	2019	216.409	-54.806	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	216.419	-54.795	0.947	-5.806	-2.078	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	216.394	-54.798	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	216.413	-54.798	–	-2.82	-1.84	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	216.405	-54.8	–	-3.5	-1.72	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	216.387	-54.801	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	216.4	-54.8	–	-3.28	-2.08	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	216.46	-54.8	–	-3.17	-1.55	–
Dias et al.	2002	216.412	-54.798	–	-2.82	-1.84	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	Bfr	BSS
Li et al.	2025	1.07	0.68	–	182	0.346	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2025	0.99	0.83	–	200	–	267	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	390*	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.07	0.75	–	209	0.430	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.00	0.73	0.59	104	–	–	–	–
Almeida et al.	2023	1.00	0.92	–	198	-0.011	245*	0.59	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	589	–	23	–	–
He et al.	2022	–	1.05	–	79	–	–	–	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	1.00	–	–	93	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	0.99	0.83	–	200	0.178	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.03	0.71	–	87	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.02	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	40	0.500	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.02	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	0.81	0.13	–	589	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	0.81	0.13	–	589	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.85	0.00	–	589	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.85	0.00	–	589	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	1.43	0.31	–	–	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	0.85	0.00	–	589	–	–	–	–

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3