NGC 559

(MWSC 122; FoF 551)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.95 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 60.3 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
NGC 559 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 22.387 63.301 0.334 -4.257 0.184 -77.263
Li et al. 2025 22.387 63.301 0.325 -4.258 0.254 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 22.717 63.365 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 22.387 63.298 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 22.389 63.304 0.334 -4.276 0.191 -77.171
Cavallo et al. 2024 22.396 63.297 0.333 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 22.389 63.304 0.334 -4.276 0.191 -77.171
Almeida et al. 2023 22.381 63.296 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 22.368 63.299 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 22.385 63.302 0.352 -4.264 0.261 –
Rain et al. 2021 22.387 63.301 0.325 -4.258 0.254 –
Dias et al. 2021 22.387 63.298 0.322 -4.253 0.245 -77.178
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 22.387 63.301 0.325 -4.258 0.254 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 22.383 63.304 – -4.17 0.139 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 22.387 63.301 0.325 -4.258 0.254 –
Liu & Pang 2019 22.382 63.295 0.326 -4.239 0.25 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 22.387 63.301 – – – -77.25
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 22.387 63.301 0.325 -4.258 0.254 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 22.395 63.305 – -2.675 -1.411 -37.7
Kharchenko et al. 2016 22.368 63.299 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 22.396 63.304 – -4.58 1.41 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 22.38 63.302 – -2.95 -1.07 -37.7
Kharchenko et al. 2012 22.38 63.302 – -3.19 -1.28 -37.7
van den Bergh 2006 22.34 63.28 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 22.383 63.304 – -4.58 1.41 -58.4
Dambis 1999 22.325 63.283 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.39 2.2 1.54 578 -0.025 2621 0.71 0.01
Li et al. 2025 2.50 2.09 – 661 0.054 – – –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 2.35 2.19 – 585 -0.050 – – 0.01(1)
Almeida et al. 2025 2.35 2.19 – 585 – 3293 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 6156(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.78 2.41 – 339 0.230 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.81 2.41 1.54 248 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.35 2.21 – 571 -0.095 1949(1) 0.71 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 631 – 1211 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 2.87(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 2.83 2.54 – 224 – – – 1
Dias et al. 2021 2.35 2.19 – 585 -0.025 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.88 2.19 – 257 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.83 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 1150 0.000 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.83 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.83 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.30 2.42 – 62 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.20 1.86 – 631 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.20 1.86 – 631 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 2.20 1.86 – 631 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.26 2.45 – 56 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.43 2.54 – 224 -0.250 – – –
Dambis 1999 1.99 2.30 – 45 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️