NGC 5288

(Collinder 278; VDBH 153; OCL 910; vdBergh-Hagen 153; ESO 097 07; MWSC 2168; FoF 138)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.89 UTI
0.79
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
0.83
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 46.0 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.79 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 0.83 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
NGC 5288 is a rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 0.99 (50th percentile).

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 207.196 -64.675 0.379 -3.866 -1.905 -20.997
Li et al. 2025 207.193 -64.68 0.345 -3.85 -1.935 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 207.187 -64.68 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 207.189 -64.679 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 207.2 -64.671 0.383 -3.85 -1.902 -17.803
Cavallo et al. 2024 207.187 -64.68 0.38 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 207.2 -64.671 0.383 -3.85 -1.902 -17.803
Almeida et al. 2023 207.188 -64.676 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 207.193 -64.68 – – – –
Dias et al. 2021 207.189 -64.679 0.351 -3.873 -1.928 -23.342
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 207.193 -64.68 0.345 -3.85 -1.935 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 207.183 -64.685 – -3.837 -2.005 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 207.193 -64.68 0.345 -3.85 -1.935 –
Liu & Pang 2019 207.203 -64.673 0.345 -3.841 -1.905 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 207.193 -64.68 – – – -23.83
Bica et al. 2019 207.182 -64.684 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 207.193 -64.68 0.345 -3.85 -1.935 –
Dias et al. 2014 207.183 -64.685 – -5.25 -5.79 –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 207.171 -64.695 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 207.183 -64.685 – -5.12 -5.98 –
Lynga 1987 207.182 -64.684 – – – –
van den Bergh & Hagen 1975 206.275 -64.433 – – – –
Sulentic et al. 1973 207.178 -64.674 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 2.395 1.66 1.28 417 0.225 548 0.61 1
Li et al. 2025 2.44 1.43 – 534 0.230 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.180(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 2.35 1.72 – 327 – 548 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 1224(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.04 1.43 – 631 0.220 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 2.34 1.45 1.28 337 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 2.29 1.71 – 387 0.094 475(1) 0.61 –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 2.68 1.38 – 468 – 881 – 1(1)
Dias et al. 2021 2.35 1.72 – 327 0.318 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 2.68 1.38 – 468 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 2.57 1.66 – 447 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 2.67 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 562 0.500 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 2.67 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 2.67 – – – – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 311 – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 2.17(1) 2.02 – 178 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.16 2.05 – 178 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️