NGC 3603

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.86 UTI
0.9
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
0.82
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 1.1 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.9 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 0.82 Well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
NGC 3603 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a large distance, below the mid-plane, affected by high extinction. It is catalogued as a very massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the distance and age parameters (see Parameters). It is well-studied in the literature.
Very distant High extinction Very massive Near-solar metallicity Very young

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Silver sample.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC – 168.795 -61.263 0.107 -5.578 1.96 46.083
Hunt & Reffert 2024 168.79 -61.261 0.115 -5.612 1.988 -24.616
Celli et al. 2024 168.795 -61.259 – – – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 168.774 -61.248 0.115 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 168.79 -61.261 0.115 -5.612 1.988 -24.616
Jaehnig et al. 2021 168.798 -61.258 0.106 -5.52 1.959 –
Rain et al. 2021 168.795 -61.259 0.076 -5.543 1.961 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 168.795 -61.259 0.076 -5.543 1.961 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 168.795 -61.259 0.076 -5.543 1.961 –
Soubiran et al. 2018 168.795 -61.259 – – – 28.17
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 168.795 -61.259 0.076 -5.543 1.961 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 168.78 -61.26 – -5.76 0.28 23.0
Dias et al. 2014 168.779 -61.26 – -1.77 -2.73 –
van den Bergh 2006 168.788 -61.271 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 168.779 -61.26 – -5.76 0.28 –
Dambis 1999 168.788 -61.271 – – – –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfr BSS
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 8098* – –
Celli et al. 2024 – – – 1 – 4808 – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 2.34 4.39 – 74 0.320 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 8.70 4.65 2.69 7 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 9.52* – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 9.49 4.12 – 1 – – – 0
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 9.49 – – – – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 9.49 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 9.49 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 3.80 4.19 – 7 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 3.63 4.15 – 7 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 6.90 4.15 – 1 – – – –
Dambis 1999 9.46 4.40 – 3 – – – –

(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

â„šī¸