NGC 2972

(Collinder 211; VDBH 76; MWSC 1699; OCL 778; vdBergh-Hagen 76; ESO 212 11; FoF 395)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.91 UTI
0.82
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 28.3 [N/pc2]
  • CN 0.82 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
NGC 2972 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, above the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Rain et al. (2021)
This cluster was include in (Dias et al., 2002A&A...389..871D, Cat. B/ocl) however, parameters log(t)=8.642, Av=1.198, [Fe/H]=-0.090 were taken from Bossini et al. (2019A&A...623A.108B, Cat. J/A+A/623/A108). The distance d=1633.3 (dmode+01) of Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018A&A...618A..93C, Cat. J/A+A18/A93) was use to fit the isochrone.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 145.053 -50.327 0.491 -5.051 2.516 20.225
Li et al. 2025 145.058 -50.326 0.483 -5.085 2.489 –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 145.047 -50.329 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 145.053 -50.331 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 145.062 -50.324 0.488 -5.051 2.531 9.509
Cavallo et al. 2024 145.046 -50.329 0.492 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 145.062 -50.324 0.488 -5.051 2.531 9.509
Almeida et al. 2023 145.051 -50.331 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 145.051 -50.322 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 145.058 -50.326 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 145.059 -50.325 0.512 -5.06 2.469 –
Rain et al. 2021 145.058 -50.326 0.483 -5.085 2.489 –
Dias et al. 2021 145.053 -50.331 0.487 -5.092 2.501 21.104
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 145.058 -50.326 0.483 -5.085 2.489 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 145.05 -50.323 – -5.387 2.443 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 145.058 -50.326 0.483 -5.085 2.489 –
Liu & Pang 2019 145.059 -50.33 0.485 -5.187 2.636 –
Bossini et al. 2019 145.058 -50.326 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 145.058 -50.326 – – – 21.13
Bica et al. 2019 145.036 -50.325 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 145.058 -50.326 0.483 -5.085 2.489 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 145.05 -50.322 – -3.64 5.31 20.9
Kharchenko et al. 2016 145.051 -50.322 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 145.05 -50.323 – -3.64 5.31 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 145.057 -50.325 – -4.34 6.06 20.9
Gozha et al. 2012 145.05 -50.323 – – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 145.054 -50.31 – – – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 145.05 -50.317 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 145.119 -50.336 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 145.095 -50.358 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 145.05 -50.323 – -3.64 5.31 20.89
Lynga 1987 145.069 -50.316 – – – –
van den Bergh & Hagen 1975 144.625 -50.1 – – – –
Sulentic et al. 1973 145.074 -50.331 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.95 1.22 1.15 437 -0.073 356 0.48 0
Li et al. 2025 1.61 1.22 – 716 -0.074 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.220(5) – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.74 1.53 – 445 – 378 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 782(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.89 1.32 – 589 0.290 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.86 1.30 1.15 349 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2023 1.82 1.57 – 428 0.029 335(1) 0.48 –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 537 – 35 – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 1.99 1.22 – 490 – 638 – 0(1)
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.95(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.95 1.20 – 437 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.74 1.53 – 445 0.051 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.99 1.22 – 490 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 1.93 1.52 – 372 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.95 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 1120 -1.000 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 1.91 1.20 – 439 -0.090 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.95 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.95 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.06 1.08 – 93 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.78 1.77 – 537 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.78 1.77 – 537 -0.073 – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 317 – –
Gozha et al. 2012 2.06 – – 93 -0.100 – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 2.33(1) 1.83 – 158 – – – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 – 1.07 – 93 – – – 0
van den Bergh 2006 2.06 1.07 – 93 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 2.06 1.08 – 90 -0.070(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 2.06 1.08 – 93 -0.073 – – –
Lynga 1987 1.20 1.04 – 398 – – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️