NGC 2448
(MWSC 1323; ESO 493 08; FoF 2305)
0.91
UTI
0.78
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
7.2 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.78 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 2448 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a significant percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 116.04 | -24.857 | 0.896 | -3.393 | 2.952 | 27.937 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 116.034 | -24.837 | 0.878 | -3.432 | 2.941 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 116.071 | -24.833 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 116.029 | -24.945 | 0.894 | -3.393 | 2.947 | 27.592 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 116.062 | -24.876 | 0.898 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 116.029 | -24.945 | 0.894 | -3.393 | 2.947 | 27.592 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 116.061 | -24.821 | â | â | â | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 116.071 | -24.833 | 0.882 | -3.436 | 2.927 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 116.136 | -24.663 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 116.058 | -24.857 | 0.899 | -3.387 | 2.952 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 116.01 | -24.876 | 0.898 | -3.384 | 2.952 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 116.071 | -24.833 | 0.882 | -3.436 | 2.927 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 116.034 | -24.837 | 0.878 | -3.432 | 2.941 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 116.034 | -24.837 | 0.878 | -3.432 | 2.941 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 116.064 | -24.921 | 0.895 | -3.396 | 2.961 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 116.034 | -24.837 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 116.034 | -24.837 | â | â | â | 36.98 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 116.185 | -24.681 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 116.034 | -24.837 | 0.878 | -3.432 | 2.941 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 116.145 | -24.68 | â | -2.246 | 2.899 | 19.6 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 116.136 | -24.663 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 116.142 | -24.68 | â | -1.43 | 2.93 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 116.142 | -24.665 | â | -2.87 | 4.13 | 19.6 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 116.142 | -24.68 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 116.145 | -24.679 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 116.14 | -24.68 | â | 0.3 | â | 15.0 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 116.14 | -24.68 | â | -3.8 | 4.69 | 15.0 |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.07 | 0.12 | 0.44 | 96 | 0.000 | 454 | 0.415 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 1.12 | 0.03 | â | 276 | 0.155 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.07 | 0.27 | â | 140 | â | 357 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 457(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.13 | 0.16 | â | 148 | 0.330 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.05 | 0.08 | 0.44 | 155 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 1.07 | 0.06 | â | 131 | -0.059 | 450(1) | 0.62 | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 1.07 | 0.27 | â | 140 | -0.107 | 1497 | 0.21 | 0.00 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 18 | â | 66 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.30 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 1.10 | â | â | 102 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.07 | 0.27 | â | 140 | -0.107 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.13 | 0.12 | â | 95 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.10 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 96 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 1.08 | 0.12 | â | 99 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.10 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.10 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.04 | 0.67 | â | 55 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.04 | 0.07 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.04 | 0.07 | â | 18 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.04 | â | â | 15 | â | 741 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.04 | 0.06 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.04 | 0.06 | â | 15 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.