NGC 2358
(MWSC 1159; FoF 2285)
0.90
UTI
0.77
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members)
13.3 [arcmin]
- CN 0.77 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 2358 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Close
Low extinction
Near-solar metallicity
Intermediate age
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | â | 109.268 | -17.16 | 1.07 | -1.346 | 0.576 | 28.002 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 109.261 | -17.143 | 1.061 | -1.351 | 0.542 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 109.293 | -17.185 | 1.074 | -1.384 | 0.576 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 109.246 | -17.117 | â | â | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 109.285 | -17.135 | 1.027 | -1.387 | 0.57 | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 109.272 | -17.174 | 1.071 | -1.361 | 0.607 | 27.412 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 109.283 | -17.124 | 1.07 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 109.272 | -17.174 | 1.071 | -1.361 | 0.607 | 27.412 |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 109.246 | -17.117 | 1.067 | -1.352 | 0.523 | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 109.289 | -17.135 | 1.073 | -1.348 | 0.575 | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 109.3 | -17.163 | 1.065 | -1.338 | 0.58 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 109.246 | -17.117 | 1.067 | -1.352 | 0.523 | 27.881 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 109.261 | -17.143 | 1.061 | -1.351 | 0.542 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 109.261 | -17.143 | 1.061 | -1.351 | 0.542 | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | 109.234 | -17.113 | 1.048 | -1.342 | 0.514 | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 109.261 | -17.143 | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 109.261 | -17.143 | â | â | â | 27.57 |
| Bica et al. | 2019 | 109.215 | -17.041 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 109.261 | -17.143 | 1.061 | -1.351 | 0.542 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 109.23 | -17.117 | â | -3.262 | 4.565 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 109.233 | -17.117 | â | -0.88 | 1.34 | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 109.227 | -17.148 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 109.227 | -17.148 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 109.23 | -17.15 | â | -0.4 | -1.17 | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfr | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.86 | 0.30 | â | 742 | -0.159 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 0.99 | 0.45 | â | 437 | 0.000 | 539 | 0.44 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 0.90 | 0.37 | â | 578 | â | 146 | â | â |
| Alfonso et al. | 2024 | 0.91 | 0.02 | â | 891 | -0.012 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 371* | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.95 | 0.49 | â | 468 | 0.170 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.88 | 0.23 | 1.18 | 419 | â | â | â | â |
| Cordoni et al. | 2023 | 0.90 | 0.37 | â | 578 | -0.013 | 532 | 0.56 | 0.00 |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.50 | â | 398 | â | â | â | â |
| Tarricq et al. | 2022 | 0.89 | â | â | 676 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 0.90 | 0.37 | â | 578 | -0.013 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 0.91 | 0.02 | â | 661 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.92 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Liu & Pang | 2019 | â | â | â | 331 | 0.250 | â | â | â |
| Bossini et al. | 2019 | 0.88 | 0.12 | â | 502 | 0.000 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 0.92 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 0.92 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.18 | 0.99 | â | 137 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 0.63 | 0.06 | â | 525 | â | 169* | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 0.63 | 0.06 | â | 525 | â | 54 | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 0.63 | 0.06 | â | 525 | â | â | â | â |
(*): Indicates that this parameter is assigned more than one value in the corresponding reference.


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.