NGC 2358

(MWSC 1159; FoF 2285)

0.90 UTI

0.77

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 144

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 11.0 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.77 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 2358 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the absorption and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Liu et al. (2025)
Classified as tidal capture (resonant trapping binary) 283 along with Theia_366, and of multiple system 60 along with HSC_1843 and Theia_366.

Palma et al. (2025)
Part of multiple system G215, along with HSC_1843 and Theia_366.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 2358 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	109.268	-17.16	1.07	-1.346	0.576	28.002
Liu et al.	2025	109.27	-17.17	1.07	-1.36	0.61	27.41
Li et al.	2025	109.261	-17.143	1.061	-1.351	0.542	–
Wei et al.	2025	109.293	-17.185	1.074	-1.384	0.576	–
Almeida et al.	2025	109.246	-17.117	–	–	–	–
Alfonso et al.	2024	109.285	-17.135	1.027	-1.387	0.57	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	109.272	-17.174	1.071	-1.361	0.607	27.412
Cavallo et al.	2024	109.283	-17.124	1.07	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	109.272	-17.174	1.071	-1.361	0.607	27.412
Cordoni et al.	2023	109.246	-17.117	1.067	-1.352	0.523	–
He et al.	2022	109.289	-17.135	1.073	-1.348	0.575	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	109.3	-17.163	1.065	-1.338	0.58	–
Dias et al.	2021	109.246	-17.117	1.067	-1.352	0.523	27.881
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	109.261	-17.143	1.061	-1.351	0.542	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	109.261	-17.143	1.061	-1.351	0.542	–
Liu & Pang	2019	109.234	-17.113	1.048	-1.342	0.514	–
Bossini et al.	2019	109.261	-17.143	–	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	109.261	-17.143	–	–	–	27.57
Bica et al.	2019	109.215	-17.041	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	109.261	-17.143	1.061	-1.351	0.542	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	109.23	-17.117	–	-3.262	4.565	–
Dias et al.	2014	109.233	-17.117	–	-0.88	1.34	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	109.227	-17.148	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2007	109.227	-17.148	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	109.23	-17.15	–	-0.4	-1.17	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	0.9	0.265	1.18	525	-0.006	270	0.5	0.0
Liu et al.	2025	1.17	0.16	–	355	–	–	–	–
Li et al.	2025	0.86	0.30	–	742	-0.159	–	–	–
Wei et al.	2025	0.99	0.45	–	437	0.000	539	0.44	–
Almeida et al.	2025	0.90	0.37	–	578	–	146	–	–
Alfonso et al.	2024	0.91	0.02	–	891	-0.012	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	371⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	0.95	0.49	–	468	0.170	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	0.88	0.23	1.18	419	–	–	–	–
Cordoni et al.	2023	0.90	0.37	–	578	-0.013	532	0.56	0.00
He et al.	2022	–	0.50	–	398	–	–	–	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	0.89	–	–	676	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2021	0.90	0.37	–	578	-0.013	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	0.91	0.02	–	661	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	0.92	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	331	0.250	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	0.88	0.12	–	502	0.000	–	–	–
Soubiran et al.	2018	0.92	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	0.92	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.18	0.99	–	137	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	0.63	0.06	–	525	–	169⁽¹⁾	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2007	0.63	0.06	–	525	–	54	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	0.63	0.06	–	525	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3