NGC 2353

(MWSC 1152; FoF 1400; CMa15)

0.91 UTI

0.82

C_N

1.0

C_dens

0.75

C_C3

1.0

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N₅₀ (P>50% members) 281

Stellar density (N₅₀/rad) 52.7 [N/pc²]

C3 classification AB

C_N 0.82 Rich
C_dens 1.0 Very dense
C_C3 0.75 High quality
C_lit 1.0 Very well-studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 2353 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Relatively close Low extinction Near-solar metallicity Intermediate age

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 2353 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	108.642	-10.254	0.831	-1.105	0.771	15.606
Li et al.	2025	108.641	-10.257	0.816	-1.121	0.72	–
Wei et al.	2025	108.646	-10.255	0.845	-1.1	0.788	–
Almeida et al.	2025	108.634	-10.266	–	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	108.641	-10.25	0.829	-1.095	0.775	17.627
Cavallo et al.	2024	108.636	-10.263	0.833	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	108.641	-10.25	0.829	-1.095	0.775	17.627
Cordoni et al.	2023	108.634	-10.266	0.826	-1.114	0.721	–
Just et al.	2023	108.621	-10.248	–	–	–	–
He et al.	2022	108.638	-10.255	0.841	-1.102	0.783	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	108.642	-10.238	0.823	-1.092	0.771	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	108.644	-10.25	0.849	-1.105	0.752	–
Santos-Silva et al.	2021	108.66	-10.23	0.8	-1.09	0.77	–
Rain et al.	2021	108.641	-10.257	0.816	-1.121	0.72	–
Dias et al.	2021	108.634	-10.266	0.826	-1.114	0.721	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	108.641	-10.257	0.816	-1.121	0.72	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	108.641	-10.257	0.816	-1.121	0.72	–
Liu & Pang	2019	108.635	-10.26	0.834	-1.087	0.746	–
Bossini et al.	2019	108.641	-10.257	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	108.641	-10.257	0.816	-1.121	0.72	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	108.63	-10.267	–	-1.282	0.836	22.3
Kharchenko et al.	2016	108.621	-10.248	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	108.625	-10.267	–	-3.92	-1.18	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	108.627	-10.25	–	-3.22	1.36	22.3
Gozha et al.	2012	108.625	-10.267	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	108.624	-10.273	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2007	108.63	-10.27	–	0.25	–	22.3
Piskunov et al.	2007	108.624	-10.273	–	–	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	108.625	-10.267	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	108.63	-10.27	–	-2.81	0.94	22.3
Kharchenko et al.	2003	108.63	-10.27	–	-3.15	0.45	–
Chen et al.	2003	108.646	-10.272	–	-3.76	1.67	38.0
Dias et al.	2002	108.625	-10.267	–	-3.92	-1.18	18.78

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.14	0.31	0.83	102	0.065	482	0.41	0.0
Li et al.	2025	1.21	0.29	–	306	0.145	–	–	–
Wei et al.	2025	1.17	0.35	–	191	0.250	591	0.35	–
Almeida et al.	2025	1.14	0.52	–	134	–	631	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2024	–	–	–	–	–	566⁽¹⁾	–	–
Cavallo et al.	2024	1.15	0.41	–	178	0.130	–	–	–
Hunt & Reffert	2023	1.13	0.17	0.83	146	–	–	–	–
Cordoni et al.	2023	1.14	0.52	–	134	-0.055	1426	0.47	0.00
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	16	–	144	–	–
He et al.	2022	–	0.60	–	63	–	–	–	–
Tarricq et al.	2022	1.19	–	–	107	–	–	–	–
Jaehnig et al.	2021	1.18⁽¹⁾	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Santos-Silva et al.	2021	1.07⁽¹⁾	0.53⁽¹⁾	–	114⁽¹⁾	-0.130⁽¹⁾	–	–	–
Rain et al.	2021	1.18	0.31	–	126	–	–	–	0
Dias et al.	2021	1.14	0.52	–	134	-0.055	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2020	1.22	0.28	–	102	–	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders	2020	1.18	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Liu & Pang	2019	–	–	–	132	0.500	–	–	–
Bossini et al.	2019	1.14	0.37	–	80	0.000	–	–	–
Cantat-Gaudin et al.	2018	1.18	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	1.14	0.24	–	87	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	1.18	0.39	–	16	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	1.18	0.39	–	16	–	–	–	–
Gozha et al.	2012	1.12	–	–	94	–	398	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	1.12	0.22	–	11	–	185⁽¹⁾	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2007	1.12	0.22	–	11	–	65	–	–
van den Bergh	2006	1.12	0.22	–	93	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	1.12	0.22	–	11	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2003	1.12	0.22	–	–	–	–	–	–
Chen et al.	2003	1.12	–	–	90	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.17	0.31	–	126	–	–	–	–

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️

1 2 3