NGC 2348

(ESO 088 01; MWSC 1075)

0.19 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.0

C_dens

0.62

C_C3

0.16

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 21

Core radius and density 265 [pc], 0.0 [pc^-2]

C3 classification AC

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.0 Very loose
C_C3 0.62 Intermediate quality
C_lit 0.16 Rarely studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 2348 is a sparse, very loose object of intermediate C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a very large^* distance, well below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as an old cluster (see Parameters). It is rarely studied in the literature, with no articles listed in the last 7 years.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~97.09 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.08 kpc).

⚠️ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (C_dup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Relatively close Low extinction Old

Cantat-Gaudin & Anders (2020)
Loose grouping marked as unverified or non-existent. Listed in catalogues with parameters but commonly classified as a cluster remnant. More details in Appendix A of the article.

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 2348 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	105.624	-67.404	0.01	1.297	1.194	–
Bica et al.	2019	105.785	-67.408	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	105.765	-67.39	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	105.765	-67.39	–	-0.788	3.07	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	105.763	-67.412	–	-3.6	6.61	–
Joshi et al.	2016	105.765	-67.39	–	–	–	–
Tadross	2014	105.763	-67.412	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	105.763	-67.412	–	-3.37	6.47	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	1.08	0.41	–	2985	–	–	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	1.08	–	–	2985	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	2.11	0.48	–	6310	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	1.08	0.39	–	2985	–	–	–	–
Tadross	2014	1.07	0.41	–	1800	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2002	1.07	0.41	–	1820	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️