NGC 2345
(MWSC 1120)
1.0
UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
38.6 [N/pc2]
- CN 1.0 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 1.0 Very high quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 2345 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate distance, below the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age, metallicity, and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 107.079 | -13.198 | 0.356 | -1.342 | 1.374 | 58.995 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 107.075 | -13.199 | 0.348 | -1.332 | 1.34 | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 107.084 | -13.21 | 0.359 | -1.325 | 1.331 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 107.074 | -13.203 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 107.078 | -13.19 | 0.36 | -1.336 | 1.38 | 88.003 |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 107.085 | -13.202 | 0.359 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 107.078 | -13.19 | 0.36 | -1.336 | 1.38 | 88.003 |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 107.056 | -13.199 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 107.08 | -13.203 | 0.375 | -1.339 | 1.351 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 107.075 | -13.199 | 0.348 | -1.332 | 1.34 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 107.074 | -13.203 | 0.347 | -1.331 | 1.333 | 59.546 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 107.075 | -13.199 | 0.348 | -1.332 | 1.34 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 107.075 | -13.199 | 0.348 | -1.332 | 1.34 | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 107.075 | -13.199 | â | â | â | 60.94 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 107.075 | -13.199 | 0.348 | -1.332 | 1.34 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 107.07 | -13.193 | â | -0.531 | -1.349 | 59.2 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 107.056 | -13.199 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 107.075 | -13.193 | â | -0.56 | -0.04 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 107.062 | -13.2 | â | -0.55 | -0.12 | 59.2 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 107.075 | -13.193 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 107.065 | -13.187 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 107.075 | -13.183 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 107.07 | -13.19 | â | -1.13 | 0.03 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 107.1 | -13.19 | â | -1.3 | -0.05 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 107.075 | -13.193 | â | -0.56 | -0.04 | 59.19 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 107.075 | -13.193 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 2.54 | 1.89 | 2.8 | 76 | 0.218 | 2446 | 0.39 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 2.64 | 1.46 | â | 679 | -0.064 | â | â | â |
| Wei et al. | 2025 | 3.05 | 1.56 | â | 200 | 0.500 | 4340 | 0.39 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 2.43 | 1.89 | â | 72 | â | 2446 | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 3839(1) | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 3.02 | 1.78 | â | 186 | 0.690 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 2.48 | 1.78 | 2.80 | 81 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 79 | â | 871 | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 2.68(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 2.65 | 1.89 | â | 71 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 2.43 | 1.89 | â | 72 | -0.100 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 2.67 | 1.04 | â | 209 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 2.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 2.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 2.65 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 2.34 | 1.87 | â | 80 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 2.60 | 2.13 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 2.60 | 2.13 | â | 79 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 2.25 | â | â | 71 | â | 219 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 2.25 | 2.11 | â | 55 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 2.25 | 1.92 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 2.25 | 2.11 | â | 55 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 2.27 | 1.92 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 2.25 | 1.91 | â | 71 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.72 | 1.84 | â | 25 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.