NGC 2335

(MWSC 1100; FoF 2080; CMa19)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.91 UTI
0.81
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Radius (P>50% members) 6.8 [arcmin]
  • CN 0.81 Rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 0.75 High quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
NGC 2335 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, intermediate-age cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the age and metallicity parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 106.688 -10.03 0.579 -0.798 -0.634 23.85
Li et al. 2025 106.69 -10.023 0.585 -0.784 -0.642 –
Almeida et al. 2025 106.679 -10.015 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 106.723 -10.041 0.574 -0.789 -0.628 24.277
Cavallo et al. 2024 106.675 -10.017 0.582 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 106.723 -10.041 0.574 -0.789 -0.628 24.277
Just et al. 2023 106.704 -10.028 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 106.694 -10.029 0.618 -0.779 -0.662 –
Santos-Silva et al. 2021 106.67 -10.03 0.58 -0.77 -0.66 –
Rain et al. 2021 106.69 -10.023 0.585 -0.784 -0.642 –
Dias et al. 2021 106.679 -10.015 0.581 -0.793 -0.658 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 106.69 -10.023 0.585 -0.784 -0.642 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 106.704 -10.028 – -0.798 -0.586 –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 106.69 -10.023 0.585 -0.784 -0.642 –
Liu & Pang 2019 106.7 -10.014 0.571 -0.791 -0.654 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 106.69 -10.023 0.585 -0.784 -0.642 –
Loktin & Popova 2017 106.71 -10.027 – -1.9 -2.647 8.7
Kharchenko et al. 2016 106.704 -10.028 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 106.704 -10.028 – 0.37 -2.34 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 106.71 -10.03 – 0.2 -2.99 8.7
Gozha et al. 2012 106.704 -10.028 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 106.706 -10.027 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 106.71 -10.03 – 0.25 – 8.7
Piskunov et al. 2007 106.706 -10.027 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 106.704 -10.028 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 106.71 -10.03 – 1.45 -3.31 –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 106.71 -10.05 – 0.98 -2.38 –
Chen et al. 2003 106.716 -10.045 – – – –
Dias et al. 2002 106.704 -10.028 – -0.91 -3.18 -3.59

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.455 1.22 2.41 158 -0.030 700 – 0.0
Li et al. 2025 1.54 1.39 – 107 -0.142 – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 1.46 1.48 – 65 – 693 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 985(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.73 1.26 – 219 0.560 – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.59 1.36 2.41 148 – – – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 158 – 468 – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.60(1) – – – – – – –
Santos-Silva et al. 2021 1.45(1) 1.54(1) – 42(1) -0.090(1) – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.63 1.21 – 162 – – – 0
Dias et al. 2021 1.46 1.48 – 65 -0.071 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.66 0.83 – 324 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.63 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 355 0.250 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.63 – – – – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.47 1.22 – 171 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.41 1.29 – 158 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.41 1.29 – 158 -0.030 – – –
Gozha et al. 2012 1.42 – – 162 0.080 776 – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 1.42 1.21 – 120 – 708(1) – –
Piskunov et al. 2007 1.42 1.21 – 120 – 136 – –
van den Bergh 2006 1.42 1.21 – 162 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 1.42 1.21 – 120 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2003 1.41 1.21 – – – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 1.42 1.22 – 160 -0.030(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.42 1.22 – 162 -0.180 – – –

(N): Indicates that are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Visualization

ℹ️