NGC 2319

(MWSC 1064)

0.18 UTI

0.0

C_N

0.01

C_dens

0.25

C_C3

0.32

C_lit

1.0

C_dup

N_m (P>50%) 23

Core radius and density 11 [pc], 0.04 [pc^-2]

C3 classification CC

C_N 0.0 Sparse
C_dens 0.01 Very loose
C_C3 0.25 Low quality
C_lit 0.32 Poorly studied
C_dup 1.0 Unique

📥 Members 📊 Colab 🔬 Bayestar19

MOCA 🔍 CDS 🔍 Simbad 🔍 CDS (α, δ) 🔍 Simbad (α, δ)

Overview

ℹ️

NGC 2319 is a sparse, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate^* distance, above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as an old cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.75 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~0.98 kpc).

⚠️ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (C_dup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Close Low extinction Old

Data

🔍 Search references for NGC 2319 in: SciX Simbad

ℹ️

Reference	Year	RA [deg]	DEC [deg]	Plx [mas]	pmRA [mas/yr]	pmDE [mas/yr]	Rv [km/s]
UCC	99999–	105.192	3.043	0.211	-0.655	-0.523	–
Just et al.	2023	105.164	3.037	–	–	–	–
Bica et al.	2019	105.27	3.042	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2018	–	–	–	-1.6	-0.92	–
Dib et al.	2018	105.171	3.035	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	105.135	3.043	–	-0.171	-0.794	–
Sampedro et al.	2017	105.133	3.042	–	-1.52	-2.81	–
Joshi et al.	2016	105.171	3.035	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	105.164	3.037	–	–	–	–
Dias et al.	2014	105.133	3.042	–	-1.09	-3.09	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	105.171	3.035	–	-0.95	-2.3	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	105.171	3.036	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	105.18	3.04	–	-0.54	-1.55	–

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference	Year	Dist [kpc]	Av [mag]	DAv [mag]	Age [Myr]	[Fe/H] [dex]	Mass [Msun]	B_frac	BSS
UCC	99999–	0.98	0.33	–	1084	–	91	–	–
Just et al.	2023	–	–	–	1084	–	47	–	–
Dib et al.	2018	0.98	–	–	1084	–	–	–	–
Loktin & Popova	2017	3.10	0.90	–	1349	–	–	–	–
Joshi et al.	2016	0.98	0.33	–	1084	–	135	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2016	0.98	0.33	–	1084	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2013	0.98	0.33	–	1084	–	–	–	–
Piskunov et al.	2008	1.10	0.16	–	407	–	–	–	–
Kharchenko et al.	2005	1.10	0.16	–	407	–	–	–	–

Visualization

ℹ️