NGC 2244
0.93
UTI
0.9
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
76.2 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.9 Very rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 2244 is a very rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by moderate extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very young cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity parameter (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a very small percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 98.012 | 4.908 | 0.653 | -1.708 | 0.234 | 27.148 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 98.088 | 4.917 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 97.985 | 4.927 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 97.985 | 4.927 | 0.657 | -1.737 | 0.253 | 31.885 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 98.045 | 4.914 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 97.993 | 4.905 | 0.659 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 97.985 | 4.927 | 0.657 | -1.737 | 0.253 | 31.885 |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 98.029 | 4.917 | 0.681 | -1.734 | 0.221 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 98.045 | 4.914 | 0.617 | -1.598 | 0.179 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 98.088 | 4.917 | 0.605 | -1.563 | 0.186 | 92.271 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 98.045 | 4.914 | 0.617 | -1.598 | 0.179 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 98.045 | 4.914 | 0.617 | -1.598 | 0.179 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 98.046 | 4.914 | 0.617 | -1.598 | 0.179 | 102.43 |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 98.045 | 4.914 | â | â | â | 75.18 |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 98.045 | 4.914 | 0.617 | -1.598 | 0.179 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 97.98 | 4.942 | â | -0.04 | -1.04 | 26.2 |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 97.979 | 4.942 | â | -0.23 | -1.13 | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 97.979 | 4.942 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 97.969 | 4.943 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 97.98 | 4.94 | â | 0.32 | â | 26.16 |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 97.969 | 4.943 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 97.975 | 4.933 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 97.98 | 4.94 | â | -1.42 | -0.32 | 26.16 |
| Lada & Lada | 2003 | 98.73 | 4.42 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 97.99 | 4.94 | â | -0.95 | -0.3 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 98.087 | 4.891 | â | -0.65 | 0.67 | 36.6 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 97.979 | 4.942 | â | -0.65 | 0.67 | 30.67 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 97.979 | 4.942 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.45 | 1.44 | 2.43 | 5 | -0.214 | 1120 | â | 0.0 |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.25 | 1.57 | â | 13 | â | 705 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.127(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 1388(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 13 | â | 2097 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 1.24 | 1.28 | â | 4 | 0.260 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 1.42 | 1.63 | 2.43 | 4 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 1.45(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 1.55 | 1.46 | â | 2 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.25 | 1.57 | â | 13 | -0.214 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.48 | 1.46 | â | 13 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 1.55 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2019 | 1.30 | 1.36 | â | 8 | -1.112 | â | â | â |
| Soubiran et al. | 2018 | 1.55 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2018 | 1.55 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.45 | 1.44 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.45 | â | â | 2 | -0.460 | 851 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.45 | 1.24 | â | 5 | â | 1422(1) | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2007 | 1.45 | 1.24 | â | 5 | â | 354 | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.45 | 1.43 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.45 | 1.24 | â | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Lada & Lada | 2003 | 1.60 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.45 | 1.24 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 1.45 | â | â | 0 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.66 | 1.46 | â | 2 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 1.43 | 1.50 | â | 3 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: intermediate fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.
Lada & Lada (2003)
Embedded cluster within âŧ2 Kpc of the Sun.