NGC 2180

(MWSC 765)

Click to load Aladin Lite
0.18 UTI
0.0
CN
0.02
Cdens
0.25
CC3
0.32
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Core radius and density 4.3 [pc], 0.1 [pc-2]
  • CN 0.0 Sparse
  • Cdens 0.02 Very loose
  • CC3 0.25 Low quality
  • Clit 0.32 Poorly studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

â„šī¸
NGC 2180 is a sparse, very loose object of low C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a moderate* distance, well below the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a low-mass, old cluster (see Parameters). It is poorly studied in the literature.

(*): The parallax distance estimate (~4.95 kpc) differs significantly from the median photometric distance (~1.88 kpc).

âš ī¸ Warning: the low UTI value and no obvious signs of duplication (Cdup=1.0) indicate that this is quite probably an asterism, moving group, or artifact, and not a real open cluster.

Cantat-Gaudin & Anders (2020)
Investigated multiple times as a dissolving cluster, but Gaia DR2 proper motions and parallaxes show no coherent group; confirmed as an asterism. More details in Appendix A of the article.

Data

â„šī¸
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 92.454 4.788 0.202 0.156 0.2 48.648
Just et al. 2023 92.43 4.806 – – – –
Bica et al. 2019 92.45 4.806 – – – –
Angelo et al. 2019 92.433 4.823 – – – –
Dias et al. 2018 – – – 0.61 -3.01 –
Dib et al. 2018 92.437 4.805 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 92.445 4.807 – 0.039 -0.495 –
Sampedro et al. 2017 92.45 4.807 – -1.85 -3.93 –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 92.43 4.806 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 92.45 4.807 – -1.55 -3.55 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 92.437 4.805 – 0.6 0.19 –
Piskunov et al. 2008 92.436 4.81 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 92.44 4.81 – 1.34 -1.83 –

💡 Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.88 0.92 – 2002 – 31 – –
Just et al. 2023 – – – 2265 – 35 – –
Angelo et al. 2019 1.05 – – 710 – 27 – –
Dib et al. 2018 1.88 – – 2265 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 1.96 0.92 – 126 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 1.88 1.25 – 2265 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 1.88 1.25 – 2265 – – – –
Piskunov et al. 2008 0.91 0.00 – 1738 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2005 0.91 0.00 – 1738 – – – –

Visualization

â„šī¸