NGC 2169
(FSR 0947; MWSC 740)
0.90
UTI
0.77
CN
1.0
Cdens
0.75
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad)
50.9 [N/pc2]
- CN 0.77 Rich
- Cdens 1.0 Very dense
- CC3 0.75 High quality
- Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
- Cdup 1.0 Unique
Overview
NGC 2169 is a rich, very dense object of high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a close distance, near the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a near-solar metallicity, very young cluster (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.
Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.
Data
| Reference | Year | RA [deg] | DEC [deg] | Plx [mas] | pmRA [mas/yr] | pmDE [mas/yr] | Rv [km/s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 92.127 | 13.947 | 1.038 | -1.096 | -1.604 | 10.488 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 92.125 | 13.951 | 0.982 | -1.068 | -1.655 | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 92.129 | 13.937 | â | â | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | 92.118 | 13.967 | â | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | 92.118 | 13.967 | 1.035 | -1.086 | -1.612 | 17.224 |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | 92.125 | 13.951 | â | â | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 92.144 | 13.918 | 1.033 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 92.118 | 13.967 | 1.035 | -1.086 | -1.612 | 17.224 |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 92.124 | 13.934 | â | â | â | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | 92.092 | 13.991 | â | â | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | 92.129 | 13.962 | 1.038 | -1.127 | -1.613 | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 92.122 | 13.951 | 1.048 | -1.076 | -1.661 | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 92.125 | 13.951 | 0.982 | -1.068 | -1.655 | â |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 92.129 | 13.937 | 0.975 | -1.059 | -1.659 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 92.125 | 13.951 | 0.982 | -1.068 | -1.655 | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 92.125 | 13.951 | 0.982 | -1.068 | -1.655 | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 92.1 | 13.966 | â | 0.072 | -0.856 | 22.3 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 92.092 | 13.991 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2014 | 92.1 | 13.965 | â | -1.85 | -2.68 | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 92.1 | 13.99 | â | -1.84 | -2.37 | 22.3 |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 92.1 | 13.965 | â | â | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 92.091 | 13.969 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2007 | 92.1 | 13.97 | â | 0.15 | â | 22.23 |
| Froebrich et al. | 2007 | 92.246 | 13.876 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 92.135 | 13.966 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 92.1 | 13.97 | â | -2.17 | -2.52 | 22.22 |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 92.13 | 13.97 | â | -2.96 | -3.74 | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 92.127 | 13.988 | â | -4.21 | -2.45 | 17.0 |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 92.1 | 13.965 | â | -4.21 | -2.45 | 22.5 |
| Dambis | 1999 | 92.125 | 13.967 | â | â | â | â |
đĄ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.
| Reference | Year | Dist [kpc] | Av [mag] | DAv [mag] | Age [Myr] | [Fe/H] [dex] | Mass [Msun] | Bfrac | BSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCC | 99999â | 1.03 | 0.62 | 1.21 | 8 | -0.179 | 184 | 0.32 | 0.0 |
| Li et al. | 2025 | 0.98 | 0.72 | â | 4 | -0.248 | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2025 | 1.00 | 0.82 | â | 8 | â | 169 | â | â |
| Zhang et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | â | -0.224(1) | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2024 | â | â | â | â | â | 230(1) | â | â |
| Celli et al. | 2024 | â | â | â | 12 | â | 199 | â | â |
| Cavallo et al. | 2024 | 0.93 | 0.78 | â | 3 | -0.060 | â | â | â |
| Hunt & Reffert | 2023 | 0.93 | 0.58 | 1.21 | 5 | â | â | â | â |
| Almeida et al. | 2023 | 0.94 | 0.81 | â | 8 | -0.179 | 234(1) | 0.32 | â |
| Just et al. | 2023 | â | â | â | 8 | â | 41 | â | â |
| He et al. | 2022 | â | 0.80 | â | 6 | â | â | â | â |
| Jaehnig et al. | 2021 | 0.94(1) | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Rain et al. | 2021 | 0.99 | 0.59 | â | 11 | â | â | â | 0 |
| Dias et al. | 2021 | 1.00 | 0.82 | â | 8 | -0.092 | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin et al. | 2020 | 1.07 | 0.85 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Cantat-Gaudin & Anders | 2020 | 0.99 | â | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Loktin & Popova | 2017 | 1.04 | 0.62 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2016 | 1.03 | 0.62 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2013 | 1.03 | 0.62 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Gozha et al. | 2012 | 1.05 | â | â | 12 | â | 30 | â | â |
| Piskunov et al. | 2008 | 1.03 | 0.62 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| van den Bergh | 2006 | 1.05 | 0.62 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2005 | 1.03 | 0.62 | â | 8 | â | â | â | â |
| Kharchenko et al. | 2003 | 1.05 | 0.62 | â | â | â | â | â | â |
| Chen et al. | 2003 | 1.05 | â | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
| Dias et al. | 2002 | 1.05 | 0.62 | â | 12 | â | â | â | â |
| Dambis | 1999 | 0.99 | 0.60 | â | 10 | â | â | â | â |
(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.
MOCA


Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: intermediate fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Silver sample.
Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.