NGC 188

(Melotte 2; Collinder 6; MWSC 74; OCL 309; FoF 651)

Click to load Aladin Lite
1.0 UTI
1.0
CN
1.0
Cdens
1.0
CC3
1.0
Clit
1.0
Cdup
Stellar density (N50/rad) 63.2 [N/pc2]
  • CN 1.0 Very rich
  • Cdens 1.0 Very dense
  • CC3 1.0 Very high quality
  • Clit 1.0 Very well-studied
  • Cdup 1.0 Unique

Overview

ℹ️
NGC 188 is a very rich, very dense object of very high C3 quality. Its parallax locates it at a relatively close distance, well above the mid-plane, affected by low extinction. It is catalogued as a massive, near-solar metallicity, very old cluster, but with a large variance across recent sources for the metallicity and mass parameters (see Parameters). It is very well-studied in the literature.

Note: This object contains blue stragglers according to at least one source.

Note: This object shares a large percentage of members with a later reported entry. See table with shared members information.

Almeida et al. (2025)
Mass determination: good fit. Isochrone match: good fit. Gold sample.

Cavallo et al. (2024)
Gold sample.

Hunt & Reffert (2024)
Classified as open cluster. CMD class: 1.00 (50th percentile).

Rain et al. (2024)
Well-studied BSSs are distributed across regions intersected by multiple binary evolution tracks, reinforcing the interpretation that many BSSs far from the ZAMS originate from binary evolution.

Ahumada & Lapasset (2007)
Membership probabilities according to (2003AJ....126.2922P) and (1972AJ.....77...74U): star 1003, 90%; 1032, 98%; 1043, 98%; 1050, 97%; 1093, 98%; 1102, 98%; 2008, 97%; 2020, 97%; 2024, 97%; 2031, 93%; 2046, 99%; 2069, 98%; 2074, 92%; 2082, 98%; 2105, 98%; 2119, 93%; 2127, 98%; 2138, 94%; 2151, 97%; 3074, 95%; 3115, 98%; 3135, 93%; 3151, 98%. Star 2189 is given 90% in (1972AJ.....77...74U) but 0% in (2003AJ....126.2922P). In the photometric study (1969ApJ...158..669E) the following stars are cited as blue stragglers: 1003, 1005, 1032, 1033, 1043, 1093, 1102, 1103, 1112, and 2046. Star 2127 is a W Ursae Majoris eclipsing binary (2003AJ....126..276K). An hyphothetical relation between the blue stragglers and the apparent lack of bright giants in the cluster nucleus is discussed in (1990AcA....40...61K). In (1989AJ.....97..759T) and (1972AJ.....77...74U) it is suggested that the cluster is somewhat younger than is usually agreed, so several stars that appear as blue stragglers would not be such. In the proper motion study (1996AJ....111.1205D) it is found that the stragglers are not more centrally concentrated than the red giants. In the CCD study (1990AcA....40...61K) the discovery of a probable FK Comae variable (star V8) is reported; this star may be a `red straggler' candidate.

Data

ℹ️
Reference Year RA [deg] DEC [deg] Plx [mas] pmRA [mas/yr] pmDE [mas/yr] Rv [km/s]
UCC 99999– 11.786 85.243 0.525 -2.32 -1.007 -41.837
Otto et al. 2026 11.837 85.251 – -2.31 -0.96 -41.9
Nizovkina et al. 2025 11.837 85.251 – – – –
Li et al. 2025 11.798 85.244 0.507 -2.307 -0.96 –
Guerco et al. 2025 12.0 85.2 0.52 -2.34 -1.04 -41.8
Hu & Soubiran 2025 11.858 85.25 – – – –
Wei et al. 2025 11.729 85.239 0.522 -2.305 -0.962 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 12.536 85.322 – – – –
Almeida et al. 2025 11.824 85.241 – – – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 11.837 85.251 0.523 -2.318 -1.015 -41.127
Cavallo et al. 2024 11.858 85.25 0.523 – – –
Rain et al. 2024 11.775 85.243 0.526 -2.322 -1.015 –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 11.837 85.251 0.523 -2.318 -1.015 -41.127
Angelo et al. 2023 11.825 85.233 – -2.32 -1.01 –
Cordoni et al. 2023 11.824 85.241 0.509 -2.302 -0.955 –
Just et al. 2023 11.821 85.252 – – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 11.798 85.244 – – – –
Jaehnig et al. 2021 11.786 85.244 0.537 -2.308 -0.952 –
Rain et al. 2021 11.798 85.244 0.507 -2.307 -0.96 –
Dias et al. 2021 11.824 85.241 0.509 -2.302 -0.955 -41.602
Spina et al. 2021 11.791 85.244 0.509 -2.303 -0.953 –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 11.798 85.244 0.507 -2.307 -0.96 –
SΓ‘nchez et al. 2020 11.867 85.255 – -2.415 -1.032 –
Donor et al. 2020 11.85 85.255 – -2.33 -0.92 -41.4
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 11.798 85.244 0.507 -2.307 -0.96 –
Liu & Pang 2019 11.767 85.245 0.508 -2.308 -0.95 –
Bossini et al. 2019 11.798 85.244 – – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 11.798 85.244 – – – -41.7
Bica et al. 2019 11.943 85.261 – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 11.798 85.244 0.507 -2.307 -0.96 –
Angelo et al. 2019 12.004 85.246 – – – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 11.865 85.255 – 0.554 -1.476 -45.0
Kharchenko et al. 2016 11.821 85.252 – – – –
Dias et al. 2014 11.867 85.255 – -3.0 -0.37 –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 11.85 85.255 – 0.15 -1.43 -45.0
Gozha et al. 2012 11.867 85.255 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 11.85 85.255 – 0.11 -1.84 -45.0
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 11.733 85.244 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2007 11.86 85.25 – 0.14 – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 11.875 85.25 – – – –
van den Bergh 2006 12.108 85.255 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 11.242 85.35 – -1.48 -0.56 -44.0
Dias et al. 2002 11.867 85.255 – -0.21 0.17 -42.35
Lynga 1987 11.135 85.33 – – – -50.0
Sulentic et al. 1973 11.11 85.337 – – – –

πŸ’‘ Note: The UCC values are estimated from its identified members.

Reference Year Dist [kpc] Av [mag] DAv [mag] Age [Myr] [Fe/H] [dex] Mass [Msun] Bfrac BSS
UCC 99999– 1.86 0.25 0.43 5164 0.089 3295 0.48 18
Otto et al. 2026 – – – 7079 0.080(15) – – –
Nizovkina et al. 2025 1.76(4) 0.39(4) – 5164(4) -0.093(4) – – –
Li et al. 2025 1.82 0.26 – 6352 0.062 – – –
Guerco et al. 2025 – – – 7080 0.070 – – –
Hu & Soubiran 2025 – – – – -0.100(5) – – –
Wei et al. 2025 2.00 0.31 – 3550 0.250 1660 0.48 –
Carrasco-Varela et al. 2025 1.86 0.23 – 6194 0.200 – – 18(1)
Almeida et al. 2025 1.86 0.23 – 6194 – 3478 – –
Hunt & Reffert 2024 – – – – – 3655(1) – –
Cavallo et al. 2024 1.79 0.32 – 3802 0.180 – – –
Rain et al. 2024 1.74 0.25 – 7904 – 14860 0.33 –
Hunt & Reffert 2023 1.83 0.23 0.43 2630 – – – –
Angelo et al. 2023 1.70 0.35 – 6310 0.050 26(1) – –
Cordoni et al. 2023 1.86 0.23 – 6194 0.112 1583 0.51 17(1)
Just et al. 2023 – – – 4467 – 3112 – –
Spina et al. 2022 – – – – 0.090 – – –
Jadhav & Subramaniam 2021 1.70 0.21 – 7079 – 7464 – 14(1)
Jaehnig et al. 2021 1.87(1) – – – – – – –
Rain et al. 2021 1.86 0.11 – 7586 – – – 22
Dias et al. 2021 1.86 0.23 – 6194 0.112 – – –
Spina et al. 2021 1.97 – – 7079 0.088(20) – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2020 1.70 0.21 – 7079 – – – –
Kounkel et al. 2020 1.85 0.40 – 4786 – – – –
Donor et al. 2020 – – – – 0.090 – – –
Cantat-Gaudin & Anders 2020 1.86 – – – – – – –
Liu & Pang 2019 – – – 4370 0.250 – – –
Bossini et al. 2019 1.67 0.08 – 7534 0.110 – – –
Soubiran et al. 2018 1.86 – – – – – – –
Cantat-Gaudin et al. 2018 1.86 – – – – – – –
Angelo et al. 2019 1.82 – – 7080 – 323 – –
Loktin & Popova 2017 2.10 0.28 – 4130 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2016 2.00 0.27 – 4467 – – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2013 2.00 0.27 – 4467 -0.010 – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2012 – – – – – 3902 – –
Gozha et al. 2012 2.05 – – 4285 0.120 – – –
Kharchenko et al. 2012 2.00 0.27 – 4467 -0.010 – – –
Bukowiecki et al. 2011 2.08(1) 0.22 – 3162 – – – –
Ahumada & Lapasset 2007 – 0.25 – 4266 – – – 24
van den Bergh 2006 2.05 0.25 – 4266 – – – –
Chen et al. 2003 2.05 0.26 – 4280 -0.020(1) – – –
Dias et al. 2002 1.71 0.11 – 7586 0.120 – – –
Lynga 1987 1.55 0.13 – 5012 -0.060 – – –

(N): Indicates that there are N extra values assigned to this parameter in the corresponding reference.

Cluster % RA DEC Plx pmRA pmDE Rv UTI
CWWDL 3252 76.1 11.78 85.24 0.53 -2.32 -1.02 -42.0 0.0

πŸ’‘ Note: The % column shows the percentage of members that NGC 188 shares with each listed object.

Visualization

ℹ️